5,358 Pages

As you can see in the client, the rating is in accordance with values provided by Rito (although there are minor differences, as their 'Utility' description no longer involves vision; and they're using only rank 1, whereas wiki utilizes both 0 and 1).

Wiki should mostly just reflect these values without subjective alterations. However, I have to personally agree that such level of utility seems unjustified to me as well. If their in-client definition of utility still included a vision, then such amount could possibly be reasonable.

I don't think that "fixing" the value on the website, thus making it different from the values provided within the client, would be an appropriate/robust solution though. Maybe feel free to report this anomaly via Rito's bug reporting tool. I already did the same for Ezreal OriginalSquare Ez, whose 1/1/1/1/1 ratings are quite suspicious.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.