5,326 Pages
an anonymous contributor
  Loading editor
    • Indeed it does not as it that's how it goes. https://youtu.be/h6PGaPNrliU

      Edit: Nice idea to refer eight patches old source.

        Loading editor
    • it's considered a pet in vandiril's video too.

      I don't think that confirms anything. Yea, i see that the 3/6 increased to 4/6 but that may be a tooltip bug. Just like revitalize increases its heal stat when it doesn't heal you.

      To be completely confirmed you would need to test it when you have 6 stacks of minions.

        Loading editor
    • I don't know who this vandiril's person is and neither did you provide a link for your source. According to google, every video he has made about Cho'Gath is over year old so you really think they are reliable as sources?

      Anycase, in V9.1 the Feast works as per these videos https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLh0JvlmwJSLlnCHJctuN07znLbjh5vAI2

      Please stop reverting edits that you don't have sources or better knowledge. Its agains CoC.

        Loading editor
    • vandiril's video was the most recent one with cho'gath eating malz's voidlings (3.5 months ago) that i've seen. That's when i wrote that note.

      I'll keep reverting edits without proof. It happened before that people deleted stuff that were still canon, and so it may happen again. Sometimes i'm right, sometimes i'm not.

      This is one of the cases when i'm not, and i'm happy about it since you gave the proof.

        Loading editor
    • an anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • What you are doing makes no sense. It totally lacks consistency with the others Season masteries, and in the near future (Season 2017) might become an unnecessary problem.

    Example: We are in the beginning of Season 2017, new Mastery Talents are here. One of this Mastery is named Veteran's Scars. By following LoLwiki logic, this mastery shall be named Veteran's Scars (Season 2017 Mastery) and not simply Veteran's Scars. With the pages that we have right now, it will certainly create conflicts and ambiguous situations.

    So I'm asking you kindly to undo your edits and leave the Season 2016 Mastery with the atribute (Season 2016 Mastery).

      Loading editor
    • View all 9 replies
    • A discussion in the Wiki discussions and announcements board might be necessary here to decide if this is going to be the future mastery pages.

        Loading editor
    • Tylobic wrote: A discussion in the Wiki discussions and announcements board might be necessary here to decide if this is going to be the future mastery pages.

      Looks nice although I am no fan of pages that bury their own data behind (several) templates. If any of the masters info would change, one should follow the template jungle and fix it somewhere else than in the actual article. The nagain patch history IS collected and archived in the article itself. It's the way those with power in the wiki want to do it and I am done fighting (organization) development windmill's without pay, just saying it's a short sighted policy in a wiki placed platform.

      For the structure part I say it again, combine the Patch History and Older versions to one section. As now the patch history section describes in words what is show in length and pictures in the older versions section.

      For making a bigger discussion and show about issue is kinda pointless. If it has any (real) issues, then it can be changed. Be bold and go forth. Although I understand your hesitation. The people in power in this wiki rarely want to listen to reasoning. As long it is cool and exactly as Riot has said it has to be The Way®. Never mind how a normal human observes the articles or wiki.

        Loading editor
    • an anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
  • You have an insult counter? And I'm on it? I'm flattered.

      Loading editor
    • I've removed it. I don't think it's conducive to any good atmosphere here to personally collect every instance of an insult. That being said, if a user is repeatedly demonstrating their inability to positively interact with the people around them, we can do something about that.

        Loading editor
    • It is not offending anyone and it is simply a counter to keep up who is "repeatedly demonstrating their inability to positively interact with the people around them" so that when the 'cup is full' I have easily reference where to point to the admin for the repeating pattern. If you don't want me editing your personal page, don't come editing mine without grounds.

        Loading editor
    • Keep it in a private place then. As it is, it only serves to agitate the people on your list.

        Loading editor
    • My own profile page is as non-public/private as it gets. If they get agitated from it I don't see why. It is something that has happened, there is proof where and when, they can't change that. Their following actions determine what is going to happen.

        Loading editor
    • an anonymous contributor
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.