League of Legends Wiki:Request for Moderator/Akali 2

Template:RfAV I, Teh, nominate Akali for moderatorship. Since his last moderator nomination, Akali has demonstrated a significantly high level of editing activity, and in particular, very high levels of anti-vandalism activity. By granting Akali moderator rights, I trust that he will be more effective in his editing activity. — TehAnonymous <3 19:16, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Questions

• Question —

Voting

Support

1. Support — See nomination. — TehAnonymous <3 19:16, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
2. Support — I'm with Teh on this one, Akali does revert alot of vandalism, i believe he have earned the rights to be able to ban them too. Dah' Blob ;D ^{Talk :3} 21:36, May 15, 2013‎ (UTC)
3. Support — He edits a lot, reverts plenty of vandalism and is constantly coming to me with vandals and such to deal with. He could certainly make great use of these rights. RadarMatt (talk) 21:26, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
4. sure Ajraddatz (Talk) 11:43, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
5. Support — Eh, sure, whatever  NeonSpotlight  Talk  Contribs  19:51, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
6. Support — Yes, I noticed he fished out a lot of vandalism for us to check on. It would be good to have very active moderators working on wikia. Mineko Charat Lucky (talk) 03:03, May 17, 2013 (UTC)
7. Support — Since Akali's last nomination, Akali has made a much bigger effort at performing anti-vandalism efforts, and I feel that at this level, it is suitable to trust this user with moderator rights. LionsLight_(talk) 06:13, May 17, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Neutral —

Oppose

1. Oppose — he doesn't need nor deserve moderator rights. I'd trust him with rollback happily, however. Destroying small children is one of the things Anasigma does best. 19:32, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

• Comment — @Psykolog your hostility seems particularly vehement and based on personal dislike. Please elaborate on why you feel that Akali neither "needs nor deserves moderator rights", in an objective manner. — TehAnonymous <3 19:49, May 15, 2013 (UTC)