League of Legends Wiki:Request for Adminship/Technology Wizard 2

Template:RfAV

This page will be protected until further notice.- KazMx ( Message me! | E-Mail me! | [[Special:Contributions/KazMx|Special:Editcount/KazMx Edits!]] ) - ( 18:36,9/10/2011 )

I feel Tech has been a lot more mature since this incident and I feel he will be able to use his admin rights like he was originally meant to do. Tech obviously needs these rights since he has made several things like this and this and with only 1 admin he could definately be placed as an admin on this wiki. --LoLisNumbaWan 07:45, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Support

1. Support — As nominator--LoLisNumbaWan 07:45, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
2. Support — He was fine before and I didn't see the reason why his rights where removed. He's a great Moderator and can be a great Admin too. Jamesrulez1•Talk• My Contribs 10:37, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
3. Support — He's very active and always takes care of vadals nicely. Ivo09 13:03, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
4. Support — Proactive user and great with the community. - KazMx ( Message me! | E-Mail me! | [[Special:Contributions/KazMx|Special:Editcount/KazMx Edits!]] ) - ( 16:37,9/21/2011 )

Neutral

1. Neutral —

Oppose

1. Oppose — - For the same reason I supported the removal of his admin rights. He's immature and can't take criticism whatsoever. He has prevented wiki progress multiple times due to his own personal problems as a result of his aforementioned immaturity and that is not something I want to see in an admin on this wiki. His Sysop Requests page also highlights his errors such as removing a bot highlight from an account that still has bot rights, adding the wrong color for content directors in the mediawiki, not protecting pages (even those of his own creation) properly, laziness in deleting comments from a vandal, etc. I'll end this with a quote from my post on the removal page "Tech's attitude, especially as an admin, is just completely ridiculous in all accounts. Not only does he act with immaturity [ . . . ] he deals with issues in a hasty, personal bias filled, way, not with a level head that is required of someone with these level of rights"  NeonSpotlight  Talk  Contribs  08:23, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
2. Oppose — Pretty much what Neon said. We've already seen how Tech handled the wiki as an administrator and I don't think he's ready to get those powers back yet.

UberTri125 Talk [[Special:Contributions/UberTri125|Special:Editcount/UberTri125 Edits!]]| 13:23, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

1. Oppose — nothing has changed, and beyond that he is currently being desysopped on pokemon.wikia. ajr 15:02, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
   • Comment — Not relevant. Please disregard this as we only evaluate a user's behavior on this Wiki. - KazMx ( Message me! | E-Mail me! | [[Special:Contributions/KazMx|Special:Editcount/KazMx Edits!]] ) - ( 15:28,9/10/2011 )
     • I would argue that if a user is proving them-self to be immature and not ready for admin tools anywhere, it should be noted here. ajr 15:29, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• This thread should be started by him, since he is the only one to know when to apply to a position back. And If I had to vote I guess I'll say he is still not ready at least from my point of view. - KazMx ( Message me! | E-Mail me! | [[Special:Contributions/KazMx|Special:Editcount/KazMx Edits!]] ) - ( 12:39,9/10/2011 )
• I respect your vote Aj, but you are not allowed to advertise things that have nothing to do with here. All you are doing is giving me a bad reputation, and if you have no reasoning for me to me an admin here, then I don't think your vote should count at all. You should only vote on this wiki if you have reasoning from this wiki. Otherwise people can just go to other wikis and go ruin their reputation just because they don't have anything else to argue with. I'm sorry but your vote is wrong in so many ways. Like I said, I don't mind that you opposed, but your reasoning is what bothers me. That is just rude and uncalled for. User:Technology Wizard/Signature

  How does the fact that you are still having problems with admin tools have "nothing to do with here"? The people at pokemon.wikia.com seem to be bringing up the same points as in your desysop request here, so I'd say that it is very relevant in showing that nothing has changed since you desysop request here. My reasoning is "from this wiki"; however, in addition to all the evidence I need on your desysop request here, I also have the evidence from your desysop request on another wiki, and I see no reason why that cannot be presented as evidence here. You call my behaviour in raising a legitimate concern "rude and uncalled for". The entire point of the RfA system is to determine whether or not a candidate is ready for the sysop tools. You want a reason for me opposing here? "Nothing has changed" since the desysop request. ajr 22:42, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

  What have I done that is wrong here? User:Technology Wizard/Signature

  Where were you during your desysop request? Must I really repeat those reasons? ajr 22:45, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

  I haven't done anything to still be considered immature, I haven't ever abused my rights (even before the demotion), and I don't interact with users that want to start problems. User:Technology Wizard/Signature

  I would consider the edit war with the talk page dilema and the following drama that came out of it immature. «Texas Snyper» (My Talk - Contribs) 22:57, 9/10/2011

  I guess I agree with the drama that came out after it. But it was quickly resolved and I have been a lot calmer now. Also regarding the edit war, the only thing I did wrong was continuing to tango with the other user, I should have taken straight to Kaz. User:Technology Wizard/Signature

• Why is this request protected, anyways? ajr 23:34, September 14, 2011 (UTC)

  It is suspended by Kaz until further notice. That's all I currently know anyway. User:Technology Wizard/Signature