<p>How do I measure the missile speed of a champion ability? I want to add as much missile speeds as possible, but I don't find them all. Anyone who knows? Thanks.
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
10,832
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by DarkSigi
0
<p>Yeah, I've had this idea for ever. You know how time consuming it is. It's definitely worth it!
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<p>
</p><noscript>
</noscript> Support — I definitely approve, I'm all for consistency!
<p></p><noscript>
</noscript> Question — "on their first instance of appearing in the champion's ability descriptions, and their first instance only." Can I add something to this? If you open a new section such as "Ability Details" that is normally hidden from the page, you should link any firsts again. On every new section. This is how it has been done till now (Or should be at least).
</p><noscript></noscript> Support — I definitely approve, I'm all for consistency!
<p></p><noscript></noscript> Question — "on their first instance of appearing in the champion's ability descriptions, and their first instance only." Can I add something to this? If you open a new section such as "Ability Details" that is normally hidden from the page, you should link any firsts again. On every new section. This is how it has been done till now (Or should be at least).
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<p>Haha, it is funny ppl saying she has a "terrible clear speed"... Yet, I have most farm of any jungle i'm up against all the time, every time...
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
1
<p>I main Akali jungle since some time now and I like it a lot. You are prety much useless pre 6 and you better don't even show yourself before level 6. It's even worse then pre 6 Warwick ganks. However at level 6 your ganks are pretty deadly. You can proc Runeglaive every 2 seconds if your time it correctly so your clears are actually very good. I love Akali jungle so much, I changed my name to "A wiId Akali" (on EUW) :D
If you need any help or tips just ask me :)
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<p>I got most missile speeds from this thread, it's not becouse I don't know how to measure it, that he doesn't know: http://leaguebot.net/forum/Upload/showthread.php?tid=1303
</p><p>If only I knew how to measure them myself... :/
But I'm 100% certain that Draven's R isn't 2000 u/s...
</p><p>EDIT: Hmmm, I take that back... I just saw a clip where draven's ult goes a s fast as Ez's. So it really is 2000.
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<p>Do you use Precision X? If so try to switch to MSI Afterburner, that will fix your problem.
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<p>All hail Tyrannical Wiki Overlord Willbachbakal the First!
</p><p>"bows"
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<p>I agree Phoenix169.
</p><p>But we cannot ever stand in our Tyrannical Wiki Overlord Willbachbakal the First's way.
</p><p>We must bow to our Lord. Forgive us, my Lord.
</p><p>"Bows"
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<p>"Any time I've tried to remove improper usage, though, it's been overruled in future edits."
</p><p>Yeah, I recognize this... #Willbachbakal -_-
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<p>On patch 5.8 it also said:
</p><p>"This is a little complicated, but the short of it is that the Dragon's Might buff was calculating its +6% AD a little weird. First, it didn't multiply with bonus attack damage (so that's no good) and second, it assumed a 1.0 AD ratio for anything that used an AD ratio (even if that ratio was, in reality, much lower). This isn't to say that AD scaling spells were all using 1.0 ratios, just that the +6% AD on Dragon's Might was scaling like that. This also probably exposes a bit of how math works in our game, but that's a confusing bag of goodies in and of itself.
</p><p>Auto attack damage for champions with Dragon's Might and AD items will now be slightly higher
</p><p>Physical damage spells will now deal slightly less damage when interacting with Dragon's Might (unless the champion has a lot of bonus AD or their abilities scale higher than 1.0 AD)"
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<p>Hmmm, a bit back a few things changed:
</p><p>"Cassiopeia gets less AP when combined with %AP amplifying effects
</p><p>Last patch we modified how the first Dragon buff interacts with Rabadon's Deathcap (from multiplicative to additive, with an expected ~1-2% ability power change), but failed to document the larger hit to Cassiopeia, who was tripling (quadrupling?) down on it with her passive, Dragon buff, masteries, and Rabadon's Deathcap. We're documenting it now and realize this is late game Cassi nerf, but we're watching how this shakes out first.
</p><p>LATE GAME CASSI NERF
</p><p>Dragon buff and Rabadon's Deathcap now interact additively rather than multiplicatively. When these two ability power % modifications (and masteries) interact with Cassiopeia passive, they now give roughly ~12% less bonus ability power at late, late game."
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<p>Impressive math skills, but for me that's Chinese, that's why we need a simple formula, I saw it was wrong, but I can fix it myself :(
</p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)
0
<div class="quote"><i>Emptylord wrote:
*Archmage + Rabadon's + 500 stack Aspect of the Serpent = +99.5%
<p>I'm sorry, but this can't be right, because (16.02 + 6 + 58.59 + 40 + 180 + 135.3102 + (4 × 120) + 40) + 136.96% = 2265.14850592 and not 2097 (actual in-game value) </p>
*Archmage + Rabadon's + 500 stack Aspect of the Serpent = +99.5%
- Archmage + Rabadon's + 500 stack Aspect of the Serpent + Dragon's Might = +117.85%
- Archmage + Rabadon's + 500 stack Aspect of the Serpent + Aspect of the Dragon = +136.96%
<p>I'm sorry, but this can't be right, because (16.02 + 6 + 58.59 + 40 + 180 + 135.3102 + (4 × 120) + 40) + 136.96% = 2265.14850592 and not 2097 (actual in-game value) </p>
(Edited by DarkSigi)