10,831
pages
ALL POSTSThe future of Champion Strategy pages
<p>tl;dr: Strategy pages, should we keep them as is, should we try to salvage them as a concept, or should we just get rid of them completely. Reply below with your opinions.
</p><p>Strategy pages have been a contentious subject for many a wiki user over the past couple years, they're one of the few places on the wiki where we host subjective information and opinions rather than just hard, fact based data and to some that isn't the goal of a wiki and as a result those users feel strategy pages should be removed. We've had this discussion before but never really got anything out of it but we're here today to try and settle this years long debate.
</p><p>I'm personally of the opinion they should be removed and that a wiki is not the place for things like build/gameplay suggestions, there are plenty of other sites out there if a user wants that kind of information. I suggest moving the official riot information like recommended items to a different tab and just either archiving the strategy pages or deleting them all.
</p>
(Edited by NeonSpotlight)
<p>The information about Warmog's on Pyke is the kind of thing I would still in the usage-information on his innate.
</p>
(Edited by Emptylord)
<p>can the autoplay ""champion spotlight" from every champion page be disabled already? its so annoying, its 2019 it should be clear by now nobody wants an autoplay video when theyre checking a page
</p>
(Edited by Werwar400)
<p>It'd be nice werwar but there's not much that can be done about it, they were put there by Wikia staff and for some reason they won't allow for them to be removed, and it's annoying because other than that and the terrible Wikia mobile site which is again out of our control this is a great wiki
But this isn't really related to Champion Strategy pages. Perhaps create a new thread if you wish to discuss it further.
</p>
(Edited by Inkybinky3)
<p>do you know anyone who could tell the wikia staff themselves to end it? why do they have ultimate control over it anyway? its doesnt make any sense, sorry to derail but the discussion seems pretty much over anyway
</p><p>Nobody wants it there, its actively annoying a bunch of people and nobody seems to bother to remove it, I get that its difficult, but then we need to know who exactly is responsible for preventing this
</p>
(Edited by Werwar400)
<p>"why do they have ultimate control over it anyway?"
</p><p>well idk, maybe because fandom is their platform? People complained about the video that shows at the top of the champion pages, and fandom finally removed it about a month ago.
</p><p>anyway, yea, let's not continue this discussion over here
</p>
(Edited by AnataBakka)
so any updates?
(Edited by Lunatic Lunala)
<p>Well the articles themselves have been hidden on the landing page for a couple months now. We'll be moving "critical" information to other areas over the coming months, although more substantial design work may be needed and so there's no rush.
</p>
(Edited by Emptylord)
Keep it and make a separate section for it
(Edited by Deathstrker)
this was already a month ago
(Edited by Lunatic Lunala)
1
<p>Lack of censorship is a chief strength
</p><p>I have divergent game theories and tactics polished over 5 yrs
</p><p>of 8 games a day, (2 milion XP) this is one of the few plalces,
</p><p> (I've yet to find another outlet beside this one)
</p><p> where you can post an opinion,
</p><p>Revise , update, and archive the useful ones, I would suggest posting effectiveness ratings
</p><p>( I would volunteer to track) so people can review the RESULTS of these theories.
</p><p>As a collective we could fine tune this groups build ideas, and cease having to wait for the next META from Korea.
</p><p>But as soon as you wipe it clean, and just put up items for a build on Wiki
</p><p>How/who decides what goes up? , Its going to wind up being SOMEONE's build idea
</p><p>might as well be ours. I have no need to come here if the advice is go look it
</p><p>up elsewhere, Fandom could be THE defninitive source. Removal, doesnt even try.
</p>
(Edited by REJhin)