Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-27802145-20191204001233/@comment-6800048-20191204032711

I believe there's also the issue of when buzzword colors are used and when effects are simply italicized.

Additionally, your examples also highlight another problem with the inconsistencies of the formatting of abilities as certain descriptions find it important to note how long the empowered attack lasts but many others (such as the example with Ekko's Phase Dive) do not at all list the window of time Ekko has to use his primed attack.

I would be inclined to agree to use INNATE preceding keywords in champion passives, but it also begs the question of whether champion ability passives should also utilise INNATE to standardize the formatting, or rather just say PASSIVE - RAVENOUS so that passives on QWER may follow the game tooltips.

for the ACTIVE proposal. Keeps it cleaner and to my knowledge, the in game tooltips themselves don't ever really give names to active portions of the ability unlike the passives.

on your conditional vs sequential proposal. Mainly I'm slightly confused by what you mean, if you could elaborate a bit further?

Well constructed post- I like that someone is bringing attention to it.