Talk:Mordekaiser/SkinsTrivia/@comment-80.220.112.190-20120729022431/@comment-5266525-20120802173853

If you want to argue that the Chinese art is only 'different' and not actually superior to the NA art, then I could bring you a picture that a kindergartner drew with crayons and pencils and call it just as good as the art that a professional artist using digital tools like Photoshop. Because I think it's more innocent!

The old NA art wasn't 'bad' because it was smoky and all that, now that actually was a stylistic choice, but the proportions were bad, the textures and shading were inferior, poses were 'meh' and in general it just wasn't as detailed.

I'm not advocating that Chinese art is superior, mind you, just that you can't argue that actual bad art is just 'different' because it's bad.