Talk:Jinx/SkinsTrivia/@comment-3358335-20131007225023/@comment-18521310-20131008171333

I hardly call a forum post from 2011 a consensus. Especially since it contains a comment from exactly one individual.

I'm not saying you're wrong about the idea in general. In fact, I agree with about 99% of "x champ resembles y character from z series" not being worthy of inclusion.

What I'm saying is that, in this particular case, I believe the consensus (you excluded) is that the resemblance to TF's cards is obvious and relevant enough for inclusion. To the point that most people don't even say "appears to be". Because, let's face it: it's not like you're gonna get a Red to say "yep, those are his cards." They don't have time to verify every little easter egg in every piece of artwork they put out.

So I'm not saying do away with your entire culling process, or even that the guidelines you're working on need to be changed. I'm just saying that, in this case, I think you're being far too strict in your definition and that you have been overruled by consensus. If you disagree with me, that's fine, but as you are the one who keeps reverting the edit, the burden of proof is on you. Convince the other editors and get consensus, or stop removing the trivia.