Talk:Riven/@comment-6061249-20140125131943/@comment-9008617-20140127211240

If you wanted to drop it you're free to do so. But since you were the one originally trying to correct me on what my definition of what spammability is, I feel it was in my right to clarify and give a small nod towards Neon for correctly deducing that spammability isn't just about the CD times (see mana vs resourceless) - although Riven's E does actually have a relatively low CD especially when properly built with CDR. And it's really to argue that the CD isn't spammable when at max rank Riven's E has a CD of 3.6 to 6 seconds and since CD starts on cast it means the shield is down for as little as 2.1 seconds. So in essence, Riven's E is both spammable by my definition throughout the entire game and by your definition as the game progresses and dependent on starting/alotted CDR. Like I said, we've had the argument before... >.>

'''"As another note, think Leyrann meant to mitigate damage, not simply use the shield." - Cliff'''

I don't follow what you're saying here. The shield mitigates damage. I posted, along with the site this info came from, that you just need 2 out of 6 shields per minute to recoup the hp regen loss due to the shield buff. 2 out of 6 is 33% efficiency... so if you can use Riven's skills correctly 33% of the time then you get a passing grade - i.e. low standards and arguably low skill cap.

But it was arguably even lower before when the shield duration was 2.5 seconds... so there's always that.