Talk:Champion statistic/@comment-24055932-20160203165258

Honestly, I think the formula, while being correct, looks more difficult than it has to be. For one, I dislike naming constants with "x" (which is something I learned the hard way, as many people have this fixed idea of x being the variable), and as second, fractions may be beautifull for a mathematician, but generally they do hinder making rough estimates.

I'd propose using this formula instead: b + x·(n - 1)·(0.685 + 0.0175·n)

In which x will be substituted by g (so g = growth is more viewable) [Maybe let all constants be capitalized variables?]