Talk:Yasuo/@comment-26270532-20150404024133/@comment-26044269-20150405133502

I know what you mean, but I think you're misunderstanding the meaning of the word require.

The reason why I'm calling your argument contradictory and redundant is not because of your actual point itself but because of the examples and/or following arguments you give for it.

Since to require essentially means to need, you've basically said how any champions may use the entirety of their kit but to need it does not mean they're balanced, whilst also having said that balanced champions must use the entirety of their kit. The statement of A balanced champion is a champion that uses everything in his kit, a champion that uses everything in his kit is not always a balanced champion, is entirely true, but by having said what you've proceeded to state afterwards, you make your one and only valid point contradictory and redundant. Furthermore, to require is to need and thus, it does not imply in any way that one who requires something will have indefinite access to it (which in this case is a champion's kit as you've stated on your third paragraph).

Excuse my aggressive tone, but in the end, all you've done is stating the obvious whilst giving contradictory arguments as follow up. So I could provide you with all the counter-arguments in the world for each of your points, but I won't.