User blog comment:HeresyHorus/Syndra, a tale of a lost potential/@comment-6916359-20131029145720/@comment-12314620-20131030212524

"if you have 100 ap you still deal way less damage compared to mages of her calliber ( viktor, veigar, annie - if her bear stalks its pery for half of its summon duration - and ziggs - if you hit 2 guys in the center of his ulti while having just 1 in the outer ring is enough to surpass your damage )"

This is a great example of what I said about biased statistics. Veigar: Would you seriously ever complain that someone doesn't have Veigarlike damage potential on ult?

Viktor; Your stun is still much more reliable, easier to hit on multiple targets, has pushback, is somewhat empowered by your ult if you choose to use it after ulting... Lastly the question; how many ticks did you assume you would hit on Viktor ult? too lazy to do the maths myself

Annie: Are you seriously saying after you complained how Syndra ult has delay between cast and damage using "Annie ult deals more damage than Syndra ult with 100 ap if your opponent is derping on tibbers for 22 seconds" as statistic...?

Ziggs:(Somewhat slow, easy to see) Aoe ult dealing more damage than single target ult when it hits several targets. UNACCEPTABLE

Seriously... Delayed damage skills need to have some power over instant (or in case of Syndra near instant) damage skills, Aoe skills are also allowed to have more power when hitting multiple targets than single target skills. Also only looking a single skill at a time instead of whole champion kit is just a bad way of talking about balancing...