Talk:Zed/SkinsTrivia/@comment-5045559-20121104124235/@comment-5045559-20121105164619

@Reilock:

I was there, and witnessed the same blind hate :) it just didn't worry me too much back then. As for the "before anything else", i added the reference twice, both times placing it 2nd or 3rd, so i guess honesty isn't something you care about either.

By the way, i have bad news for you. You put Naruto to shame for being a "novice ninja show", which can be easily understood if you compare it to MK (not so much TMNT but oh well). The problem with that attitude is that you play LoL, which is widely regarded by other MOBA player as the "novice/girly/kiddy MOBA game" because of its cute, colorful graphics, amount of female characters, absence of brutal mechanisms to avoid scaring away new players, and other things. Just compare it to DotA, DotA2, HoN or whatever. So you could move to another MOBA, and stay true to your attitude of over-manliness/maturity, or you could keep playing the "kiddy" game with cute little faeries, little girls, teddy bears and teemos, while hating the "kiddy" show... because it's "kiddy"... which makes no sense.

@Typhron:

I've only ever seen the anime, never played any of the games, never read any book, in short it isn't more precious to me than to anyone else.

It's not about the anime, it's about this wiki's integrity. A wiki is supposed to gather objective data about its topic, and so far i thought this one was about that. Now that i know there are hates and censorship, i can't help but feel worried about whatever references actually made it through the hate barrier and what others didn't make the cut. It lowers the wiki's and it's crew's credibility. It makes me waste time if i'm doing a visual art research for a professional project, because true references have been ofuscated. It repels potential audience and contributors by letting them know there are hateful people going to dictate what is "mature" (or whatever criteria) enough to be displayed here.

Sorry for being annoying but i live in a democracy where freedom of speech, and article objectivity, are things. And i like it that way.

TL;DR: bias on a wiki is bad on so many levels.