Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1876049-20150731182500/@comment-24023648-20150810174542

Then to the point again, please tell me what's false about saying that effectiveness of builds is objective while what a champion does is subjective.

You have to agree it makes sense this way too.

There's nothing false, there's a lack of information and a lot of confusion.

what's objective about a champion is their kit and lore

Kit and lore are facts, not based on facts (objective).

And there must exist an objective best way for a champion to be played and/or built.

Something being objective or subjective is a matter of perspective.

For example, Twitch being weak and vulnerable doesn't say if he has low stats or no gapcloser so it's subjective as it has more than one possible answer.

Saying Kayle is centered around dealing continuous damage and giving temporary invulnerability to an ally or herself is objective, but saying she's an angel of judgment is pretty subjective because readers' perspectives (or understanding of this) may differ.

That's why I prefer cut&dry information: facts. And those bios are far from that.