User blog comment:TheTobarMethod/ADC Mid....It can work!/@comment-3250799-20130129051446/@comment-4131177-20130129152023

>> Most dont look at meta as a "thing" they look at it as a "act".<<

Because it is an act. Just sayin.

In simple terms, it [Meta is the use of out-game information and resource to affect one's in-game decisions.]

Thats pretty much a process

>> Btw, I dont have a viewpoint to begin with anyway, why should I play a game one way that everyone else does when I can play it my own way and do better? <<

Because every game you play has 4 other people in it who have to relie on a common strategy. You have to work as a team. Now with 5 people coming into one game, and everyone having his "own way to do better", how will you ever be able to agree to one strategy in 3 minutes? You wont. Find a way to do so and create a game using this system, you will be rich in less than half a year. Word.

I could go on with this discussion forever. I read a few posts of you and thought it was worth trying to talk to you (you seemed much more  intellectually capable than those other "OMG META SUCKS" crybobs i see on this site, and you probably are), but you're just like all the others, at least in regards of their opinion to meta. I'm through with this discussion. Stick to your point if you like to, or make up your mind and try to understand why meta is something to embrace. Only if you accept the current state of meta (which might change, thats why "current"), you can progress in understanding of gameplay and thereby in playing the game.