Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1876049-20150731182500/@comment-1876049-20150803110103

Dragonzzilla wrote: Onto my thoughts on the project. Naturally, I like it. But as Feirund and Gutsy have stated before, a disproportionate amount of effort goes into making the descriptions. KHO and I both know how protracted their making can be; it took us a whole hour just to come to an agreement on. We were exploring the directions we wanted the descriptions to take, still most of that hour was spent arguing over technicalities and semantics. It's not very conducive for the simple, clean editing the wiki looks for. Now, I will not deny that the project sparked my interest to actually editing the wiki again (the mood comes and goes). To be honest, I'm still surprised on how many editors wanted to pitch in, newer and older ones alike. Naturally though, there's a discrepancy in quality of their suggestions. And how others have mentioned before, there's a modicum of bias in each description. In the first descriptions I whipped up on the onset of the project, I tried to remain as unbiased as possible, giving only a brief description of what each champion can do. But it was seen as too cut-and-dry, too "scrolly" (needing to scroll down to the abilities anyway in order to understand). At this point, I'm uncertain which side to take. Well, I am sorry if your Twitch description was changed, but it was the product of me and Will deciding that a new model of description, one that was more generic and less focused on the abilities themselves was needed. Your contibutions are still welcome, your Twitch description was very good in itself just... not exactly what we decided was best. But I'm sure you can easily adapt your content to the new model, and it'd be greatly useful!