Talk:Azir/@comment-26420279-20160602031204/@comment-26128186-20160618060527

@KuraiAssassin

tbh, I ain't actually sure of the cutoff myself, but normally, I just judge if a champ is sustained burst or sustained damage based on how they play. For instance, most adc's I just call dps (aka sustained dmg) cuz of fast aa's. Exceptions are jhin and graves, who aa relatively slowly compared to other adc's, but deal higher damage when they do. And so I would call them sustained burst.

As for Diana, she's also kinda weird cuz she does indeed have a mix of burst and dps. I guess that's why rito decided to give her the fighter/mage attribute rather than assassin. She still plays a lot like an assassin tho. In addition, her passive is one of the reasons why I think Diana is a bit too strong (tho I play her a lot, I shamefully admit). Her abilities, when chained together correctly (tho its not hard to do so), deal a shit ton of damage on their own. But when u add on the fact that when she gets close to u with ult, she can get a couple of aa's to activate passive, that's another butt ton of dmg. Also, wut is that passive dmg? 250 plus 80% AP scaling?!? Why so much?!? Not even mentioning the fact that it can proc on turrets, so she can be an effective turret buster. Her play style of burst and dps combined together are also wut make lich bane and nashor's such good options on her.

...aaaaand this conversation suddenly turned into me ranting about Diana's strength...