Forum talk:Neekerivittu/@comment-4167645-20121128144117/@comment-3238314-20121203230037

"As usual, you attack the poster" - considering that this is said on a page full of replies that are civil and contain only thought out and detailed argumentation, i have to say i have no clue what you're talking about, and even if i insult the poster, it would only be a problem if my argument was  "we should not listen to what poster X says about how to play Zed because he's a pedophile". This is the proper ad-hominem. Me somewhat insulting someone is not useful to your arguments.

I never once said your opinion is dumb because you are dumb. Your opinion is dumb because it is demonstrably dumb, and you are dumb because of your use of faulty reasoning to try and sound smart. These are completely unrelated topics.

"I can't possibly waste time writing out a proper reply, but you can have a sarcastic remark thats double in length."

That's because it's not about being time-efficient, it's about sending a message. And the message is that if you want your argument to be taken seriously, you should try to make a serious argument. I'm not going to even give credibility to an argument like that, and I'll gladly write several walls of text before i argue as to why zed's Q is not an anivia Q that's AS SLOW, but with LESS WIDTH and SHORTER RANGE.