Thread:NeonSpotlight/@comment-4698489-20150813050322/@comment-1330314-20150813053838

I make "sweeping changes to the wiki" because I am an editor here who is familiar with its workings and standards, and have striven in the past few weeks to bring every champion article in the mainspace to the same standard. What followed immediately after that were people like you, who personally disagreed with certain specifics and decided to make exceptions in the mainspace for the sake of your personal enjoyment.

I think you've mistaken my intention here. I'm not undoing your edits because I don't want things to change. I just finished changing a significant portion of the wiki, and I'm ready to do it again. What I'm concerned about, however, is how your changes translate to a larger standard. I performed the edits I did based on a certain set of standards I had in mind, most of which I shared on the relevant thread and which I am willing to develop on. If you are finding issues with these rules, then one or more of them are suboptimal and need to change, which would then entail reapplying that to the mainspace and performing changes accordingly. So far, though, you've only proposed a few haphazard edits with zero consistency or rationale beyond "I don't like how this looks", and if you and the other editors were to make exceptions as you pleased, we'd be back at square one, and I'd have to overhaul those articles all over again a few months from now just to make sure there wouldn't be a huge discrepancy in the quality of champion articles. This is also a matter of consensus, which three vague remarks and one non-constructive jab do not make. There is discussion to be had on this, discussion you have been too eager to ignore and leap over until now.