Forum:Administrator and Bureaucrat issues

Hey everyone. I am creating this forum to see what everybody's thoughts are. First of all I have requested administrator rights for myself. I had question a specific opposing vote (Kaz) for what reason he opposed. We talked for a bit and then he suddenly left saying to post anything else on the wiki. So here it is. I would like to inform everyone of the unfairness that this wiki is producing. Supposedly, after looking here there is a rule that was added that long ago that has been ignored until the middle of my nomination. The rule states, "Any registered user can vote in permission requests or nominations, but community consensus is only needed for administrator and bureaucrat requests. Moderator and rollback requests are granted by a bureaucrat, but everyone is welcome to voice their opinion in them. Each user may vote once in each request or nomination.", but this hasn't been brought up ironically enough until the ending of my admin nomination. Kaz said that there hasn't been any passing nominations for admins or crats with opposing votes. Well I have a complaint against that statement. If that was the case then this should have been the closing for that nomination, however the nomination was left open to pass, even though this certain rule was supposed to be followed. The rule says that everyone needs to decide on what the nomination turns out to be, well then what happened to my nomination? I had 10 positive votes against 2 opposing. The majority should have decided it. Well it turns out that the rule is supposed to mean that all crats have to agree. Kaz first said that I needed at least 1 supporting crat, which I did, but then changed it to all crats, which doesn't make sense. We have all been following the rule as proposed here and here. Also Kaz added yet another rule, as seen here, the nomination should have passed with the new rule (no opposing votes), well why didnt it then? I want to hear what everyone else thinks about this unjust rule that was never used in any sysop nomination until today.