Board Thread:Game discussion/@comment-6110700-20130207032959/@comment-178.43.165.210-20130223132454

here is my opinion why there are better adcs than tresh:

-Q ratio: yea this ratio is big but u must w8 10 sec. to fully charge it. Better idea imo is going top udyr and get sup tresh. U will gain magic spell with 1.5 ad ratio every 6 sec! In 30 sec. tf udyr will do magi dmg with 7,5 ad ratio and tresh will gain only 6,0 ratio. But who adc normall in fight dont attack? So u will still attack with your low attack speed (lower attack speed give your Q passive more time to recharge it, if supprot tresh hit twice in 3 sec. every attack gain at max Q level bonus 30% dmg) and yea dmg seems good, BUT every attack speed item will give u higher attack speed and LESS time to recharge Q. But hay i forget about bonus dmg from souls! no i dont forget but u also gain souls if u go sup, top or even jungle! If game is long and i play sup tresh after 150+ souls i build  hurricane and every second deal something about 100 hundred dmg to 3 enemies (than they focus me, my holy armor give me longer sustain and after kill me all enemies are cleaned by my team and its 1 for 5)

-good killer lane: tresh with ofencive sup (taric) as somebody posted is very good killer lane, BUT enemy bot can switch with mid/top and if u go top they go bot, etc. BUT again there are better killer lanes: sup fidle/zyra/rumble.etc. with normall adc, who scale  better with ad.

So my point is that ofc u can go adc tresh and kill destroy some adc/sup composition, but adc trehsh is more situational pick. Im not talking that he is wrong (imo best non convencial adc is fidle, early op heal and fear let him win 1v1 with everybody adc who havent got cleanse/QSS) BUT his Q passive also proc sup/jungle/top tresh and it havent got enough good scalling to make it best adc option.

sry for english, PEACE