Talk:Jayce/@comment-8969250-20170108124312/@comment-4091261-20170207204152

It's issues like this that makes me doubt the user control on the matter. It shifts priority to satisfying random people rather than being informative. It also causes potential problems for management.

Scenarios like massive upvotes to extremely inflammatory comments causes dissonance between the priorities of the wiki. Do we adhere to our laws and block the person causing major hatred? Do we let it slide and let our laws be controlled by popularity rather than reason? Is issues like this that makes me think a discussions moderator is the most reasonable option.

They must abide by the rules and they manage emotional issues from comments by these rules. It's also easier for management since it constricts the cases to cause less tension from all users as a whole.