User blog comment:Endless Exceptions/Lame Support Excuses./@comment-4082038-20120707132356/@comment-4082038-20120713014730

1. "3. If it was not a rhetorical question then I'd rather find a psychologist who was doing the research. Your ridiculous 'answer' only proves that you're either trying to be a troll (unsuccesfully) or dumb."

2. I assume, you think you have brought arguments somewhere in this paragraph, because you have stated your thesis in the beginning of it.

"Furthermore, sticking to insults only goes to show that you actually have no content to your words and no point to prove. You're simply heckling and insulting people just for the sake of heckling and insulting, which I don't think is appropriate behaviour, especially in this wiki. Don't you have other hobbies to pursue? Do you find it rewarding to insult people who are trying to be nice to you at first?"

First sentence? You're stating your thesis, no arguments. Second sentence? You swith the focus on me instead of bringing your arguments. Third and fourth sentence are questions which are most likely rhetorical ones aimed to blackmail me or do something like that in which the first one fails.

3. Not going to prove or disprove that.

4. 1) Again, I'm not using that 'difficult words' method. I even gave you the definition of the word you were complaining about.

4. 2) Well, considering that you haven't analysed what I said proceeding with not remembering your own words, it's not me who can't grasp what's his opponent saying.

P.S. I recommend you this page to try and improve your demagoguery skills.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies