Talk:Ahri/@comment-25223119-20170202191709/@comment-31203455-20170210110527

Well she is easy to kill if you can catch her. Being easily blown to bits doesn't mean it's easy to land the damage to do so. Ahri isn't impossible to hit though, just a bit hard due to her Q speed, charm and ultimate dashes. That makes her annoying, not overpowered.

Winrate doesn't really talk about a champions balanced, just that in Ahri's case 47% were either beaten by better players, had a bad team, a bad game or were played by complete potatoes. If 1 player played Ahri in the world, and won even a single game, she'd have 100% winrate. Would that make her completely unbalanced? I would look more at the average K/D/A Ahri gets per game. Is it easier for her to get kills and not die, despite losing?

I'd risk being called a Bronzie to say that there are far worse champion out there (*cough* Zed *cough* Yasuo *cough*) and not just Shmed and Shmasuo (oh *cough*).

Ahri is not an angel either though. She does have great damage, she has mobility, poke, and a lowish skill floor but a high skill ceiling just like Yasuo, Zed and a number of other "outplay potential" champions.

This all seems like a dick-measuring contest where all contestants don't realise that they are all dicks no matter the size of their schlong! Not saying you all are dicks (or have them to measure) but the comparison between the contest above and the discussion here about "X champion is fair because Y is worse" or "X champion trades A for B means they are fine" plays on the fact that Ahri is not on the top of the Paragon Pile but nor is she sitting on OP mountain.