Talk:Bard/@comment-33536623-20150903032545/@comment-4091261-20150916150338

No.

has better overall synergy with the rest of league. The reason:.

What has is better overall synergy with a marksman--the thing that actually matters in the laning phase. So if synergy with a marksman sucks in terms of, then  is worse than  in every regard. Illogical. It just means that needs an adc that can handle himself/herself/itself/themselves without much need for assistance. In other words, any adc that can just solo a lane does well with.

So yes, is more conventional than  due to her ability to actually offer more harassment ability to her adc than. While this can be extended to say is better than, it can't be as bold as to say  is better than  at everything. can't support an as well as  can. Thing is, nobody expects to adc in the first place! Since nobody sees the champions who go well with then it's obvious nobody will believe  is good at all. This is the only reason I'd say isn't good: the popular adc champions aren't good with --which is a reasonable conclusion.