Talk:Udyr/@comment-26420197-20151125181351/@comment-27406906-20151216022438

Direct answer:  given the current terminology, it should. However, terminology surrounding Sated Devourer has always been wonky, and certain terms (e.g. "on-attack") are sometimes more applicable but sometimes don't fit the bill either.

Observation: There's no reason to build Devourer on Tidyr. Even if the 15% AD bonus procced twice on every other autoattack with Sated, the damage would still never come close to Warrior-Tidyr or Sated-Phoedyr - and that's just the math.

If you factor in that the extra 40% attack speed of Sated will almost never come into play against an enemy champion (because Tiger already gives you 70% and you DO have to move between autoattacks) - the damage difference becomes astronomical.

Further taking real-game examples into account, you won't be leaving Udyr in Tiger Stance when fighting champions (or at least you shouldn't be). You activate Tiger to get the 5-second Attack Speed buff, hit them once to get the DoT on them, maybe a second or third time while you orb-walk them, then you switch to Bear Stance to re-stun and reposition, and/or switch to Turtle to mitigate incoming counter-attack damage or a tower shot.

So - bottom line (more for other repliers than original asker) - don't complain about Sated not working for Tiger's passive 15% AD on-hit damage, because even if it did, Sated Tidyr would still be crap.