Talk:Viktor/@comment-4167645-20120106033628/@comment-3217613-20120106144345

You're simply wrong.

They put a champ that adds a new idea. Then you say that's bad. We'll, let's make all the champs be and do the same.

They make a champ that can adapt further to opponents by modifying his passive once the game has started according to your needs. You're not supposed to pick always the same augment.

Akali's passive is not free neither, you have to modify your runes or pay items ingame to be able to use it. So I guess you're saying Akali has no passive neither. I guess you can say the same about Galio's or Rammus' passives.

Different champions have different abilities and different passives. If you can't understand that I don't get why you keep playing this game. If he has no passive, you could say the same about half the roster on the game. Does Taric have a passive? Really? And Eve? And Nunu? And XXXX?

Also, you're not even comparing him to champions who share his role. Renek and Shyv. Really? I'm going to compare Trundle with Soraka for the lulz aswell someday.

The problem is, even if you had some point, it wouldn't be right simply because you're making dumb reasonements. I'm not claiming nothing about him, neither him being op or up or balanced, just showing how bad your statements are. And the worst of all is that there is some people that "agree" with you for those statements.