Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1876049-20150731182500/@comment-1876049-20150801101804

Shaw Fujikawa wrote: I do not feel that champions with particularly divergent build paths can always be sufficiently described in a single homogeneous paragraph. Tank Cho'Gath doesn't play anything like AP Cho'Gath; Ekko is in the same boat. There's Critplank, APlank and Tankplank. Lulu has her Machine Gun, AP and support playstyles to consider. Bruiser Nidalee focuses on close-range brawling over AP Nidalee's javelin poke. And these are just the off-the-wall examples as opposed to more unconventional off-builds like ADC Ahri. It seems idealistic to say you can accommodate any and all situations without being vague.

You're welcome to prove me wrong, of course, and I'm not strictly giving this a thumbs down, but it just feels to me like a bandaid fix to the problem that's more caused by an outdated page layout. :V

But the thing is, these descriptions are independant from build paths. Yes, Tank Cho'Gath doesn't follow the same build as AP Cho'Gath, but both follow the same theme and feeling. Same for all the champions you listed.

As for all the "biased" concerns, these descriptions aren't going to be "Ahri is THE MOST WONDERFUL CHAMPION EVER EVERYONE SHOULD PLAY HER AND SHE'S MY WAIFU, SHE KILLS PEOPLE IN ONE SHOT AND OMG SO GUD" :v