Talk:Orianna/@comment-24.6.218.235-20120325050332/@comment-24.141.19.110-20120327002926

@anon: "If you did well with this champion it means you are low ELO. Period. the only way you could do well with this champion is if your opponent cannot dodge skillshots, which means your opponent is 1200 ELO, which means that you are also 1200 elo.

If you dominate with Master Yi at 1200 elo it does not make Yi a good champion. And her ult isn't the "strongest positioning modifier" in the game. Alistar, Blitzcrank, Skarner...??? Anybody praising this champ is a 1200 ELO scrub. I don't even need to provide justification."

---

1) First of all, OP said the strongest AOE positioning modifier in the game. Alistar, Blitzcrank and Skarner? AOE positioning modifiers? Really? Hint: Key word is "AOE".

2) As another person posted, high ELO does not mean you can dodge every single skill shot. I don't even know what kind of players you play with. From what you've written, Morgana, Lee Sin and Blitz should not be viable in ranked. I think Cho sucks too. It's impossible to land rupture. I mean, your opponent has to be 1200 ELO if they can't dodge their skill shots right?

3) "If you dominate Master Yi at 1200 ELO, it does not make him a good champion". Similarly, if you suck with Orianna at 1500 ELO, it does not make her a bad champion either. Just using your logic here.

4) I love it when anons trash talk and assume they "don't even need to provide justification". No sir, no need at all. Huehuehue.

This being said, I don't main Orianna, but I've played her a few times. I'm no expert, but I've seem some very good players at ~1600-1700 ELO. Just because you can't play her, or you've played against bad ones, doesn't mean that the champion sucks. Although I think she deserves a slight buff.