Thread:BlackSmith/@comment-25771421-20160806101931/@comment-658634-20160902142642

Tylobic wrote: A discussion in the Wiki discussions and announcements board might be necessary here to decide if this is going to be the future mastery pages. Looks nice although I am no fan of pages that bury their own data behind (several) templates. If any of the masters info would change, one should follow the template jungle and fix it somewhere else than in the actual article. It's the way those with power in the wiki want to do it and I am done fighting (organization) development windmill's without pay, just saying it's a short sighted policy in a wiki placed platform.

For the structure part I say it again, combine the Patch History and Older versions to one section. As now the patch history section describes in words what is show in length and pictures in the older versions section.

For making a bigger discussion and show about issue is kinda pointless. If it has any (real) issues, then it can be changed. Be bold and go forth. Although I understand your hesitation. The people in power in this wiki rarely want to listen to reasoning. As long it is cool and exactly as Riot has said it has to be The Way®. Never mind how a normal human observes the articles or wiki.