Talk:Draven/@comment-24702580-20170116145624/@comment-28977071-20170124175734

"If someone with eyesight issues can use glasses, shouldn't someone with motor problems be able to use macros to assist them?"

Bad example, there is actually the obvious difference: The eyeglasses are beneficial only for really handicapped people, whereas macros provide the benefit to anyone, motoric problems or not. Hence the first tool can be allowed as only the people who really need it, would actually benefit from it.

If I borrowed a definition of w**** from the South Park, it describes someone who does for money the things that everyone could do. You can define the cheater the same way- the cheater does for reward the things that everyone could do. But in fact if everyone did, the loser would still be the same loser. Nothing like that happens with eyeglasses.

"Should a mouse with a very high dpi be allowed? It does let the user move their cursor faster that someone with a $5 mouse."

Much better example and you are imo right with this one. My personal experience is that a high-end PC or good Internet connection (despite Rito's controversial survey) greatly enhance player's performance. But you are supposed to pay money for such things so I guess it's ok as either not everyone can afford that at the same extent or it's good for business. Once again, the macros don't fulfill this condition as they are somewhere from cheap to free.

"My mouse right and left clicks are swapped because I couldn't get used to spamming right click when I was starting the game."

This is a controls' customization, very similar to what I did. If the game GUI explicitly provides tools to do such things, then obviously we can say that it is allowed. You didn't find any 'macro loading' tools within the client, did you? -_-