Talk:Braum/@comment-10880231-20140711044815/@comment-1330314-20140721010451

actually fits the bill for a lot of this. She has:
 * 1) A far better resistance steroid than Braum.
 * 2) A dash that is not only 200 units longer than Braum's, but also allows her to catch up to enemies far better and immobilizes them while doing so. It is also relatively simple to land, and has a lower cooldown than.
 * 3) A low-cost, on-demand on-hit stun that is not only far easier to land than Braum's four-hit combo, but can also be applied far more often, especially with CDR. Additionally, she has a root and an AoE stun/slow whose base cooldown is 40 to 50 seconds less than Braum's ultimate, and whose effects are not mitigated by multiple targets.

On top of all this, she has a proc that grants burst to any champion accompanying her, several instances of AoE damage that can apply said proc, and overall can output more damage than Braum even when alone, even though she is designed to have terrible damage output. Despite this, she's not only not overloaded, she's fairly balanced. Braum might still be a little on the strong side, but he is by no means overloaded. I'd say his abilities are quite straightforward, as opposed to other support kits with tons of variables and multiple uses such as the ones on and.

Fact of the matter is, you are not arguing in a productive manner. Your entire contribution to this discussion so far has been to complain about Braum, ignoring all rebutalls in the process, and to simply reassert your opinion once someone disagrees with you. Perhaps if you were to point out which specific part of Braum would need a change, or even suggest a change yourself, people debating with you would better understand what faults you find in him (besides the likely event that you lost badly to Braum in one or more lane matchups).