Thread:Willbachbakal/@comment-4881935-20140325192935

Hello, Willbach.

I hold no ill against you and I love that you are so helpful, but I seriously do not want to repeat all of this again. But you are being a persistent little bubby who will make all point of cost analyze section worthless and wrong by undermining the entire foundation.

I am willing to change the section because of something you find wrong, (a.k.a my recent proposal because you brought up the topic of implied undervalued). I am willing to listen to complaints you have and take it to consideration, and I do truly listen to what you have to say, but I cannot allow this added gold value you constantly keep putting. You are refusing to accept a small fact that I cannot overlook because it opens a loophole that ruins the foundation of all of gold value.

One loophole that is created with your logic, 100% critical chance with a champion with no AD scaling. What is the value of the 100% critical chance. Is it the 50g x 100% critical chance (the value of critical chance), or is it how much AD you have because all your attacks is guaranteed to deal double the damage.

If you honestly keep doing this over and over, I will have to agree with Lions, Nysuts, and all those who don't like the section in outright removal, hesitant I may be but would agree with them, because you are directly attaching gold value with effectiveness. You may not see it as that, but that is what you are doing.

Also, your situation is not always 100% true. If in any situation a player has % MS runes and/or masteries (and the masteries is on the first tier and extremely easy to put points in), you're situation will never happen. You may say, 'but I don't intend to do it' but it doesn't change the fact that it will happen.

I don't mind you telling people the lowest amount of MS they will get from the % MS, but stop adding the gold value. So I will say this one more time. Stop doing this.

Have a nice day, Willbachbakal. 