User talk:NeonSpotlight

Wiki Pages
For some reason. I don't know why the pages on our wiki titles league of legends wiki:  changes the pages width. Do you know what I'm saying? Like you can't see the recent changes or special:chat box on the right hand side like you normally would on a normal article.
 * The wiki thinks it's a "main page" page 05:09, November 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh I see. But on other wikis, like this one, it doesn't seem to do the same thing.
 * I'm confused, it's lego wiki and they're using the page-name Brickipedia, that's not like our situation at all. 05:19, November 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * This is a better example.
 * é =/= e 05:26, November 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * It has nothing to do with the project namespace's name, but rather whether or not the namespace is considered content or not. On Brickipedia it is, hence the crap on the side. Here it isn't, hence the lack of crap on the side. 05:35, November 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * How do I change whether it's namespace is considered content or not?
 * Contact Wikia, but project pages are better without the crap anyways, so please don't change it. 05:37, November 13, 2011 (UTC)

Upcoming Champion
Should we just remove that whole thing about the upcoming yordles, or just change yordles to champions so it would be: "2 Upcoming Champions (Possibly Yordles)"
 * Just remove it completely imo 04:09, November 15, 2011 (UTC)

Images
What's the point of deleting previous versions of images?
 * What's the point of keeping unofficial images? 00:34, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with keeping them, but what I don't understand is why you only delete the previous versions of champion squares and not other images like spells or items.
 * I only delete placeholder versions, items and spells do not have placeholder images. 00:42, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * This spell and this item have placeholder images.
 * I don't have eyes everywhere, especially when it comes to items. 00:49, November 16, 2011 (UTC)

Stuff
Hi Neon. I am not forcing you to do anything, feel free to ignore this message, but if you could take part in my project, it would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance!

Masteries
I don't understand why the current masteries are titled with (Season 2 Mastery). Shouldn't they just be titled with the name and the removed ones should be titles (Season 1 Mastery). Also should be titled (Beta Mastery), right?


 * I agree. The current ones shouldn't need it. The past ones should.


 * I didn't upload them, I've been meaning to get around to the ones in the offense and defense trees but have been busy. Season 1 masteries, imo, should also have their own category, but that's just something a little extra. 21:48, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I think they should. I'll be happy to do something about that.  Just say the word and I'll be sure to do it


 * The key thing about the category would be the name, because they weren't S1 masteries, they were release to S2 masteries.  22:04, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * I named that way to prepare in case there are new masteries. Anyways, if you searched or linked to Deadliness, it will link you to the new mastery pages. I did a blog about this, I would like you to voice your opinions there and not on a talk page that may not be read by all the people onvilved -.-  04:22, November 29, 2011 (UTC)

Comment
If there is an issue between us, please let me know so I don't like a fool trying to be nice to you if you have no concern to act mature or assume good faith.
 * It looks ugly and holds no weight, there was, in my opinion, no need to keep it on my page. 01:14, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, well please use the edit summary in situations like that because it looked like an act of immaturity. Sorry about flaming, but we both learned something.

Wiki Spotlight
Hey what do you think the wiki spotlight's quote should be? It says "Check out the new champion skins" but it doesn't sound good to the ear. What's your input?

Ribbon
Thanks for being honest about the ribbon! Actually you're the one that motivated me to change them to something similar to Aj's ribbons. I didn't like the old ones myself, but thanks! :]

Moving files~
I'll like to apologized for moving a file that was already moved by you. I was gonna do it sooner, but I got caught up with watching that Spotlight and came back to move it only to realized that you already done the job.

Champion Checklist
Wouldn't Template:NeonSpotlight_champion_checklist be better as User:NeonSpotlight/Champion_Checklist? It would still function fine, and fit better as a personal page. 02:10, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

Yes it would, thank you for bringing this up. 03:03, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

BC Nomination
Not sure if you read the message on Aj's talk, but why did you close it so fast? It hasn't even been open for a day and I never said anything about not accepting the nomination.

Hi. I consumed your comment on the nomination and at this point, I just don't know what to do? What do you suggest?


 * In the future, if you're seriously considering BC, nominate yourself and be honest and genuine in your opening statement, like I was in my admin nomination. 03:00, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ok thanks for your words. I honestly have no clue whether this nomination will pass or not, but if it doesn't, what do you suggest improving so that way I will reach your expectations. Because you seem to know how to manage crat. Basically I am asking what I should improve to gain your support.


 * Maturity 04:05, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry to be a bug, but could you give me some examples where I have recently acted immature? I only ask so I can overlook those situations, learn from them, and prevent them in the future.

Recently: "so I don't like a fool trying to be nice to you if you have no concern to act mature or assume good faith" - http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANeonSpotlight&action=historysubmit&diff=482235&oldid=482222  04:22, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * I guess so. But I did admit to my mistake though. To be 100% honest, I feel as if something else is making you oppose me though. I mean we used to get along quite well and have nice conversations like this, but now it seems like their is some type of invisible tension between us. If there is, please tell me so I can resolve it, but regarding the immaturity, I always admit to my mistakes and I am very unbiased when it comes to situations that may not be in my favor.


 * P.S. Your opinion is your opinion, but do you think that one message (a message I admitted to) cancels out the effort and positive things I have done recently as well? A few things would be the wiki teams, wiki review, anti-vandalism blog, project cleanup blog, etc. I am just saying that one message that was resolved should cancel all of my other efforts in the wiki.


 * It isn't just one message. I'm sure you know that you've been a part of a lot of immature things throughout your time on this wiki, things that others may have forgotten, but know this: I have not and and this message just proved to me that no matter how much polishing on the outside you've done you're still that immature person refusing to grow up on the inside. Also, everything you do you do fine as an administrator, I seen no advantage in you having BC rights.   05:05, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well whatever reason you're still holding, all I can say is, yeah to you I may be immature, but did you even consider what great of an age difference we have? You are at a college level mentality and I am in a high school mentality. I think that being immature is part of an experience of enjoying life, developing, and growing up. The fact that you have passed/are passing that phase in your life has nothing to do with me and mine shouldn't have anything to do with you. If this is a wiki, and we're all equal here, and users are evaluated for their efforts and needs, then why is it that you keep bringing up the same topic that you can't even give pure examples for. If anything, I still don't understand how you demoted and banned me for fixing a coding error on my message and got away with keeping crat rights. But we obviously can't communicate without things heating up, because "I'm a little immature kid that doesn't want to grow up". So all I have left to say is, "I tried". Good day.


 * Needs? "Also, everything you do you do fine as an administrator, I seen no advantage in you having BC rights. " This is a wiki, people need to have the ability to work together cohesively, I do not feel you have this capability.  You let things like personal issues and pride take precedence over the wiki and its success, I do not believe this is a quality that is appropriate for someone of your level of rights, especially not higher.  Age has nothing to do with maturity level, the fact that you even think that there is a correlation between the two only makes my feelings towards you stronger.  Maturity is something you can work on, maturity is something you should work on.  If you don't think being mature is something you can handle, no matter the reason, then I believe you're not fit to be in the position you are in now, let alone a step higher.   Within this response I have given you three solid reasons as to why I do not believe you are fit to be a BC.  05:51, December 6, 2011 (UTC)