Talk:Vladimir/@comment-201.52.153.12-20120211172623

About the nerf(please read and respond if you can):

When deciding which/why/how champions to be nerfed/buffed there's one thing Riot needs to do, and if they don't, they shouldn't be in the game design business in the first place; They need to ask: "Are there complaints from players that this champion is overpowering?".

Often i hear complaints about champions being "OP" concerning Kennen, Leblanc, Tryndamere and a few others, along with the many "needs a buff" champions. Now, whether these complaints have any actual merit is something to be evaluated separately, but the point remains, the complaints are there.

I may be wrong here, and please, do correct me if that's the case, but i've never, even if once, heard the same about Vladimir; Meaning, even if the argument could be made for him being overpowered, Riot seems to be addressing an issue that for the time being, is not a priority, if it's issue at all, while at the same time ignoring things that need to be addressed. Mind you, i do not play Vladimir, but from my personal perspective, if anything, i've always found him to be one of the least threatening champions to face.

So, my question to other players is not so much if you think the nerf itself was justified, but if you think it was something that really needed to take priority over other seemingly more relevant issues?