Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-3308937-20141123005532/@comment-658634-20141124022514

Hedgeg wrote: @BlackSmith first of all you are a staunch opponent of the idea. I don't see what my personal opinion has to do with anything as it does not change the wikisoft code and facts nor how you would know my opinion as you haven't asked it, BUT if you want my personal opinion I would say the champion articles have too much of empty, artistic, space, too much repetition (damnation, damnation, damnation...) and the gems (information) that cant be found from any other site is always buried behind crap, subpages or hide buttons.

For my professional opinion, both tabbed and tab view methods have their problems and those I have pointed out. Based on user research, slow pages get skipped and the bigger and more pull's are requested from other articles (deep/numerous template pulling) the most likely the user will get a feeling that the site is slow as the page is rendered slower. The slower the site and/or weaker the information offered, the more likely users will head to another source of information. The heavier the pages are made (render time over 1 sec), the most likely the user is getting annoyed, specially if the page (article) opened does not answer his questions. He can also give up searching for the answer if he can't find it in reasonable time due loading time, bad structure, navigation and/or layout. Taking account the fact that pages render slower on mobile decise if no Hedgeg wrote: Secondly, you are not right. the table view does not affect the categories on separate pages. Really? Then it is just a glitch in my wiki instance that every article in e.g. Category:Champion_backgrounds has a '/Background' suffix.