Talk:Lee Sin/@comment-7007348-20140425235942/@comment-9705522-20140430171855

Thats because it is that easy. Jumping behind the enemy? well, i dont see anything hard about it. Its just using your skills, most of wich are point and click or easy skillshots. Positioning is a lot easier. Lee can be peeled, but its a lot harder, since he has 2 dashes and very powerful cc. So it really doesnt matter much if you peel him. And no. He doesnt have to hit the adc. Hit the frontline with q, ward-w jump behind the adc and kick them back. After all, remember, they only need to be within 700 range of the frontline, which they have to be. Amumu is actually q into their team and ult ... if you hit a target that was badly positioned. Amumus ult has limited range. You need to hit someone who is behind the frontline. So actually, he is harder. Especially since he only has those 2 abiltiies. Amumu does worse. Less effective cc, a lot harder to be effective, a lot less damage, less mobility, and after your ult you are kinda just there and dont do much.

Actually, he was popular for roughly 2 months. Gragas for longer. My evidence? The pure fact that i check lolking regularly since it exists, and at no point was lee below the top 10, and very few times below top 5. And yes, it is quite clearly false. I mean, think about this. This game has millions of active users. Imagine that over a day. Now consider that lee has a 30-50% win rate at any given point in time. Meanwhile lux hasnt been picked in ages. Does get quite easy to see why the statistic is false, no? Also, how do the numbers not make sense? simple. Think about how many players this game has. Think about how many games are played each day. Their numbers dont add up. Also, want to see something funny? Take a look at most played for a week. Vayne is at the very top. Now click on vayne and look on pick rate. Whoops, its at 0%. Which is false by the way. Her pick rate is roughly 16%, but lee is at well over 30%. Its clear that your site is grossly inaccurate.