User blog comment:Witchking99/Avis, The Assassin of Justice/@comment-25235491-20160401111706/@comment-3391671-20160401143350

As someone willing to take the middle ground, allow me to explain. All in all, as Lesdin mentioned, PS possibly had the worst of his day, along with the fact that he is maybe a little haughty from not seeing his own concepts being released. But I'm sure he can come to terms.
 * On one side, we have Witchking who has been working on this champion ever since... early March 2013 according to his first post of Judgement. Although he has posted three reworks (including this blog), his last one was January of 2014, over two years ago. He reposts it because if reworking it on the original page wouldn't receive adequite revision by the general wikian public. He could ask friends, but that wouldn't garner much.
 * As for PS, he makes the right point that reposting the same champion is not something a blogger shouldn't do; WitchKing can defend though that he hasn't reposted Judgement on a consistant basis (every three months, for example). As for asking friends, it's fine if it's tame, but to ask friends to advertise you can be bitter. Yet, PS did someone falsely accuse you of forcing your friends to advertise for you; I'm sure you meant, "havem y friends review my work than wait for an anon to do it." The issue that I do equally observe though is more or less Witch Kings reasonings:
 * "Me commenting first is self-advertising": As much as it is self-advertising, from a blog point of view, it adds a single comment. Why is this so significant? When you compare a blog with one view to no view, a blog with one view rings that someone has commented in it while in contrast one without a view hasn't been touched. "Hopefully it really is better than Before and that people will actually comment" is less self-advertising and more about first-commenting (along with what others may claim as insecurity that your champin will not get views, when it will).
 * "Unlike some other people who might quit on a character they made": This is one unkind jab at other custom champion creators. As much as there was no mean spirit behind this comment, it is limiting how you view others. Some creators will drop a champion after much review, but in the case of others, they won't because they think like Witchking: They are family. BUT! What other posters do is abide by what I would call the "wiki blog policies & courtesies"; reposting is not a taboo, but to justify reposting with "everyone else quits, but I do not" is breach of its own. We don't repost to avoid being seemingly obnoxious and self-centered, believing that a good champion will receive enough recognition in one post, and letting those who didn't get enough of it stay safe in our hearts.
 * "I treat my champions like family and not like concepts that could be trashed.": Same as before, this is a claim no one should make, as it is not different than belittling others. I'm sure you do not refer to other champion creators you respect, but no less, this is not an attitude to be tolerated.

Otherwise, I would also advise you, Witchking, to hold your tongue. Even if PS was the aggressor, the reasonings you have made (aside from "you should be commenting on the kit, not by your prejudice) do not support your actions as much. A wholesome and good champion creator (as much as we have difference in personality and preferences) should not ask others to review a concept, as people will be drawn to a good/potentially-good concept, not one where someone advertises or begs for the review. In some way, asking for reviews is a sign of disbelief that others will review the champion, although it can be a sign of caution.