Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-1445357-20130224070947/@comment-5556439-20130225160039

I know i dont have the cleanest reputation on this wiki because of my mild temper with anons. However, I have also seen the "stressed" reactions Mineko exhibits in some posts. Whereas most people on here are generally tolerant and even-temepered during an arguement with someone who is calm, Mineko iv seen steadily increases aggression towards the person, especially if the person isnt agreeing with Mineko.(I keep saying Mineko because im suspecting they are female but im not jumping to conclusions.) They keep their tone at a meium but the aggression adds a tension to the arguement that breeds instability, ultimately turning into a "heated debate". Also, i agree with the fact that someone in userspace can be a great asset considering i havent seen many mods in userspace as of recent. You want, as RadarMatt stated, people who ENJOY and WANT to improve this Wiki and if the person qualified and with the responsibilty placed on them to do the job of improving the Wiki, doesnt do it as much as required, then they arent worthy of the responsibilty. Both of you guys have good points, but Matt I think is more on the ground and being realistic. Equal oppurtunity is great and all, but if your given a job, you need to make sure you fulfil it above and beyond the standard asked of you.