Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1876049-20150731182500/@comment-658634-20161207004531

Willbachbakal wrote: Fun fact, that was the very first think KHO and other users did with the bios. They were removed by admins and a few other users, which is one of the reasons why there's a discussion here to make sure this wiki's community as a whole is on board with the idea of champion descriptions. The huge variability in quality when that happened is also why we went to more centralized quality control while requesting bios from more users, few of whom have decided to step up, in order to make sure they'd be in good condition upon being added. This criticism is completely out of touch with the actual course of events this project went through. Fun fact, according to the community's guide and rules admins don't have that kind of privilege or power to overrule edits. Admin's role is something totally different than forcing his own agendas. This centralized quality control leads to less editors as the edits are buried deeper into the wiki markup that needs deeper understanding of the wiki and code. Having the context deeper in wiki also does not make it better. There simply is no gain. There would be more editors that would 'step up' if the policy of making the wiki harder and harder to edit would stop. There is no 10 second grammar of patch correction edits when the edited part is three, four or five templates away from the article where it is used. If you know code, then this data burying is same as using CSS to represent the actual context, not how to make it all nice and fancy.

Yeah, it has indeed been a year. Wonder why others haven't stepped up to write those descriptions if the wiki is so welcoming for the edits.