Talk:VPBE/@comment-33536623-20150805103003/@comment-35229418-20150807172048

Yes I did. Because if you tell me something like "champion A is useless against strong players" and then say "champion B is strong when played properly" you must have hit your head hard. It's like the argument "if B is good then A doesn't win" lots of people use. You have to consider the case when each and every champion is played at their best. Because with the "good players and bad players" argument, anything can beat anything. Is Katarina a bad champion because "if her enemies are good..." or because "if their enemies are bad..."? No, because when you consider her enemies good you must consider her good, and when her enemies are bad you must consider her bad. Do you really fail to understand a concept as simple as that?