Thread:ClariS/@comment-1330314-20140519023103

I'm confused as to the removal of the extended gold efficiency analysis on the article. After checking the history, I saw that another user had posted it before me, and I apologize for not checking it before making my own edit, but the analysis happens to be both correct and consistent with other similar articles, namely, , , all of which feature a comprehensive gold analysis based on the number of stacks accrued.

Furthermore, similarly comprehensive analyses happened to be featured on items such as, and , yet you removed these as well without giving a reason. While you certainly had a motive to do so, removing large amounts of content without specifying a reason is technically vandalism. At the very least, it would be better if you explained your rationale, so that other users may discuss it and decide what's best for the wiki, or at least not repeat the same mistake by adding these long gold value analyses on the above pages. 