Talk:Zed/@comment-26291883-20150420125002/@comment-6281696-20150422161752

Meh, banrate is a good indication of a champion being a problem in some way. Though doesn't necesairly means he needs a nerf. Might as well be he's just annoying as hell to deal with, or opens some ridiculously annoying tactic, or snowballs increadibly easily, or just counters the most commonly prefered strategies/playstyles/champions...

Plenty of reasons why the banrate can be high.. though the combined ban + pick rate is much more interesting. And well, being banned, or picked, in a quarter of a matches (or more) does rather indicate something's going on. It's rather a high frequency given that we have over a 100 champions to ban/pick, assuming all champions are roughly equally likely to be banned the rate should be more like 6%. For 25% to be the average rate there really should only be about 25 champions that really get banned, while the others (nearly always) pass. So either he's a outlier with his 25%, or like 75% of the character roster basicly never gets banned. Neither case is good if you ask me.

And yes, Morgana is obviously even a worse case with 35% (seriously, that's obscene with a 100 characters, even in a relative small sample size)