Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1990160-20140521040036/@comment-4881935-20140522210316

If you believe I have that type of habit, that is your choice, but none of my removal is not without reasons or purpose for this wiki. But if you wish to desire to know why I didn't bother to inform everyone about the removal is because you are a thick-headed person who never listens and will argue forever on a recorded tape. I have no desire to spend another three months arguing with a endless loop such as yourself.

I am only going to clarify myself because I don't want you to be misinterpreting what I said. I said you assign the same gold value to AP even if certain AP had no interaction with champions or items. By this, I mean for example, if a champion had 300 AP (before passive take affect), 200 of the AP is processed through  effect while 100 AP of it does not, you would value that 100 AP the exact same as the other 200 AP.

And the other examples I brought up are still true that you still support, even to this day. It still shows.

For everything else, if you seriously find having unknown variables within a comparison to be nothing of an issue, I have nothing to discuss because I already know better to have this pointless argument with you again.

I said my things for now and am just waiting to hear the admin's decision. If they choose to remove all of the content on the item pages, I will not hesitate to comply and remove them all just for the sake of not having to bother with this issue with you. But if they choose to keep it, I will persist and not allow actives, passives, and auras to be on those pages.