Thread:Double Slap/@comment-3017217-20150224212358/@comment-4091261-20150418003231

Cdr runes are interesting. I'll use them as none of these builds ever reach 40% cdr anyways.

So, do you think the builds should change according to the elixir of choice? does require you to poke the enemy every five seconds to maximize it's use and does require a substantial amount of waveclear--something  usually excels at.

Decimals that aren't shown are calculated. Proof of this can be seen through. If the damage is low enough, it can show as 0 damge for the bolts but they still deal damage. Since they deal damage, regardless of the fact that the number shown was 0, there is still a decimal number being dealt. This goes for everything, including armor and magic resistance. So it doesn't matter if it shows as 1 or 2, it still is 1.25 armor in the calculations.

Yeah, I would have done all the dragon buffs, but the bots would have pushed to win before I could even reach level 18. So I kept it at 1 or 2 dragon buffs as damage to towers doesn't mean much for.

The noble sacrifice of is to account for all enemies in the end. So I think that is a fair trade, especially with tanks growing in this meta. I think your build fits all the criteria now.

1) + : MR + anti-kite

2) : Ap + Looping

3) : Ap + Health + anti-kite

4) : Sustain + Ap

5) : Ap + Armor

6) : tankslayer + Ap

Adding more looping is pretty tricky, but I think I got another build I'm going to test.

1)  + : MR + anti-kite

2) : Ap + Looping

3) + : Health + Sustain + Looping

4) : Sustain + MR + Health

5) : Armor + Health + anti-kite

6) : tankslayer + Health + Ap

I am cutting a metric ton of sustain by taking away, however, destroying the tanks are far too important. Also, I've replaced with  as it is the only armor item that is able to prevent kiting in some form and without it, armor would be lacking in the build. This makes the build with the mix of damage and effective health. Though it'll be a LONG time, until I experiment on this again. A good eight days I would say.