Thread:ClariS/@comment-3017217-20141026134417/@comment-1330314-20141029220739

Ntoulinho wrote: I will note the difference by using roman numerals

Why?

The rest of your unnecessarily convoluted proof is absolutely not necessary, and neither are the latin terms you're misusing. Of course H2(2a) =/= 2H2(a), there's a non-zero constant. You abuse pseudo-intellectual linguo like ceteris paribus and reductio ad absurdium and QED, yet you are incapable of admitting to one of the most basic facts about linear algebra. Here, lemme draw you a graph of effective health (H2) as a function of armor, with H1 set to 1000:



You can plug in any value for armor you wish, and changing H1 simply amounts to moving the graph up or down. As you can clearly see, the graph is linear, and here follows the equation 1000 + 10x, as follows from the calculation of effective health. This is clear, visual proof that resistances do not have diminishing returns.