Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1876049-20150731182500/@comment-24023648-20150804164941

Vsagent wrote: Kind-Hearted-One wrote: TehAnonymous wrote: Teh's opinion: Fluff and flowery descriptions are a waste of space, subjective and susceptible to personal arguments, and adds little that is not on the /Background page. How is saying that Ahri is a mage that uses mobility to juke people and draw people out to kill them, that Kog'Maw is an extremely fragile glass cannon that rapes whole teams if properly protected or that Graves is a tough marksman that wants to get in your face and burst you down "subjective"? You only choose those 2 examples, but what about Lee's description? You say his damage falls off, but I can build him like an assassin which is also his secondary role. You say he shifts to utility, when I can say: you should use his ulti only as an execute.

Another example would be Twitch: I don't find him weak and vulnerable early on.

Also, you have to explain why Alistar has a "gold independence" as his kit doesn't give him gold per sec. Where did I insult you with this post? Nowhere! I gave you my valueable feedback and you? Told me why I was wrong ofc. But when someone else comes with the same information, you thank him.