Talk:Lux/@comment-25172943-20150301175124/@comment-2179912-20150325155830

I agree... I think Xerath's ulti should be buffed. I mean, I have to predict EXACTLY where my enemies- scratch that, where my enemy goes (LOL at the thought of sniping more than one with that AoE) to hit them for 43% AP... while Lux needs to merely predict their general direction to hit everyone (5man ults are pretty common) for more %AP than trueshot barrage, and have it back up in 30 seconds.

Why pick xerath again? His Q and Lux Q do similar damage and are comparable in usability and utility out of lane (one is a beam type skillshot, the other one roots). Xerath's W has better damage than her E IF you hit the bull's eye, but slows for less if you don't and her E has ludicrous range and can be used for zoning. Xerath has a stun with a mediocre scaling which is only useful for landing his QW combo- whereas Lux has a shield but can still set up her E AND R because her CC is in her Q anyway (which is easier to use than Xer E).

And she also gets a useful passive, because Lux (who can often be a support) gets a 20% bonus scaling to every spell if they're in aa range, whereas Xerath gets a flat mana restore which is arguably the most useless passive in the game once you've geared up. Perhaps topped by Zac's useless crap of a passive.