Talk:Warwick/@comment-31203455-20170201094612/@comment-31203455-20170201113323

I just don't like how it seems I have to rely more on the hope that the enemy playing whatever champion is a potato rather than the strengths and weaknesses of that whatever champion.

Many champions, and most new/updated champions seem to require more skill to beat and less skill to use. Damage is usually problem; you need not worry so much about weaknesses when you can easily blow the enemy to bits.

But hey, I know I am not a great player. I will make a good many mistakes, but I am not dumb. I just feel that when people defend the balance of whatever champion, they don't imagine their scenarios with both sides being at the same competence level.

They also tend to go for the "winrate excuse" which is essentially this champion is popular enough that ~50% of those who play them are potatoes and that doesn't take into account how many potatoes got carried or simply beat smaller potatoes.

Winrate doesn't mean whatever champion has fair strengths and weaknesses. I just hope Warwick isn't put in a place where he is deemed balanced even though 50% of his player base are deep-fried potatoes.