Talk:Kalista/@comment-25562166-20150312012600/@comment-5266525-20150328042819

I asked you for a champion whose meta build did not make sense. You gave me a bunch of idealized bruiser stats and said it made no sense instead?

To humour you, there's more to champions than mere statistics. Bruisers NEED those stats just to break even with most marksmen's extra 425 range and the burst or sustained utility of assassins/mages/tanks. What is your Wukong example meant to show? That defensive builds are pointless? Because a champion that will get threeshotted by just about everything can ignore most of it?

Full tank + Trinity Udyr wrecking everything is an Udyr thing. Some champs are just stronger with items than others, this isn't an inherent problem with builds. The 6 claymores thing is irrelevant to gameplay so there's no point talking about it.

'''YOUR OPPONENT'S ACTIONS ARE NOT FULLY RANDOM. THE ELEMENT OF SKILL EXISTS IN PREDICTING WHICH ACTION HE IS MOST LIKELY TO TAKE.'''

Otherwise, taking your argument to its logical conclusion, we'd be forced to surmise that hitting a skillshot must be nigh impossible if they're based purely on luck and there's a million things (or a hundred, or even just ten) that could go wrong with them.

No, games aren't decided by who clicks faster. Amumu's winrate is living proof.