User blog comment:Emptylord/Champion reworks/Butthurt Patch Notes/@comment-28230442-20160524005210/@comment-28230442-20160525000628

'While reading your comments I feel like you're arguing to convince me or to counter my argument, but we seem to agree... so perhaps it's just a poor choice of words, or a language barrier, or maybe I'm just putting the wrong inflections into how I'm reading what you're saying.'

You sound like my history teacher describing me after having me for 2 semesters. That's good Ol PurpleWii alright, doesn't know what he's trying accomplish to half the time.

I tend to digress off topics quickly, or simply have things lost in translation if I'm not careful; tends to how I write I guess(and I've bet you've seen how messy my posts normally are), I'll clear things up. When I was refuting your previous statement:

'Riven's damage being shared is to help actually make her "she's a 1v1 queen" more true - because quite frankly, that's a bogus weakness."

I was sort of talking to both you and Numinous J at the same time, then I went into a rant. 'I LIKE your idea of giving Riven a resource and changing her Q to share its damage; it adds more interplay to an otherwise static champion.' What I was complaining about was how the aforementioned champions were given free laning phases against certain champions, due to being allowed to be so "carefree" with their abilities.