Talk:Renekton/@comment-5009341-20120519172035/@comment-125.152.254.88-20120521161036

Some people are a bit ignorant (I know it's a severe understatement, they are basically well worse than that), but it only takes a little bit of insightful thinking to understand why the statistics are like that. Characters such as Vayne, Cass, and Olaf may have low win rates as one of the anons mentioned, while Renekton is evenly leveled according to the statistics, but there is a reason for that. Keep in mind though, that popular characters can easily have different extremes of win to loss rates. Popular characters are chosen by most people (both newbies and pros), and as we know, many people are not quite at the pro level. As a result, even though champions like Cass and Olaf are very strong picks, they have low win rates because there is an obvious tendency for unexperienced or noob players to pick them and lose. Renekton, on the other hand, is rather unpopular. In fact, it is rare to see him, especially in higher elo. The only people who play him, enjoy playing him and have come to learn of all his strengths and many of his weaknesses through many games. Thus, usually most Renektons actually know what they are doing. People who come here and speak of the severe weaknesses of Renekton probably have played a good hundred to several hundred games with Renekton and have all come to the same conclusion (that he needs a buff). So seriously, DON'T TALK AS IF YOU KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT RENEKTON AFTER WATCHING TWO OR THREE GAMES OF SOMEONE ROFLSTOMPING WITH RENEKTON. YOU CANNOT LEARN EVERYTHING ABOUT A CHAMPION AFTER PLAYING OR WATCHING ONLY A FEW GAMEs (Not even a pro can learn a champion instantly like you fools, who seem to think you guys can). Oh, and if you ignorant fools are still reading this, I'd like to say, "STFU."