Talk:Warwick/@comment-89.25.27.181-20110318120449/@comment-3457312-20110405200334

@A Wikia Contributor, in response to mine.

I'm hesitant to pick up Bloodthirster over Wit's End because, for starters, Bloodthirsters is helluva' lot more expensive. Second, as the responder above has laid out the math for us, Wit's End does more raw damage than Bloodthirster with WW's ult -- additionally, the squishy-carries I target with my ult 'generally' stack armor not MR, but this is just a cherry on top. Third, extra lifesteal is kind of useless for WW. In my experience, all the already given lifesteal WW is enough. Fourth, I'd much rather prefer the 40% AS (more auto-hits, more MBR procs, etc) and the MR, which helps make up for the loss in MR if I get Sorc boots instead of Merc boots.

I would only consider getting Bloodthirster on primarily these two conditions: (1) the enemy champs don't really have escapability, thus allowing me to land more auto-hits to make use of the flat AD increase from Bloodthirster. Most games, enemy champs do have escapability and I have to rely heavily on my ult. (2) I find that enemy champs (specifically AD-Carries) are sticking around to fight me in prolonged battles. Then it'd make more sense since the extra lifesteal and extra AD will give the edge. But even with that said, I find it debatable whether Bloodthirster is better in those given circumstances.

If you get Wit's End instead of Bloodthirster, you save 1050 gold. If you're concerned about ehancing his AD, I would put that 1050 gold toward getting a Black Cleaver. After your ult, you leave your target with full stack of BC's debuff, so you can start pounding on your target who is 45 Armor short after landing your ult. But, I'd get Sunfire's Cape solely because a werewolf with a trail of kindling sparks is badass. JK, health, armor, and DoT aura -- why not?