Thread:RadarMatt/@comment-4957702-20140819053820/@comment-3459498-20140821020312

http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:1106110 Here's an example of where you block a guy for giving his opinion. It's hypocrisy to allow one person the right to insult a user and block the other because they chose to insult you. The example also shows you blowing my decision off completely. I'm assuming I get this right as well? I'm quite surprised that you're allowed to overturn my decision without prior discussion, considering how much you despise people who do so against you.

The statement was made in reference to this wiki particularly, as I've said before. As in, the wiki itself is being slandered, which is one of the reasons why he's being blocked. To follow your line of thought, you accusing me of being involved in cross-wiki harassment is considered slander. But as much as I want to get into a shouting match with you about who's slandering who, you should first seriously consider respecting at least the overarching decision of an administrator: I've done so with your last block that has been appealed (Tesla), you should at least have the courtesy to follow procedure. Don't let your crat status get to your head.

You've never witnessed the flamebaiting because, as I've said, he's made it a point to get in your good graces. Vandals can be made moot by simply reverting their edits, flaming and toxicity on the wiki can be made moot by deleting comments, insistent incorrect uploading can be made moot by deleting images, and so forth. I don't think your point has footing here, because I'd rather tackle the issue at its roots then force users in chat to have to deal with this individually.

Since the issues are inherently in chat, I'm proposing a chat ban rather than a wiki ban, so as to provide a more suitable restriction.