Talk:Evelynn/@comment-216.27.125.34-20121225034046/@comment-4929329-20121225054916

Bias is what makes conversation existent, and is why people provide evidence to support their statements. There was no oracles nerf that affected Evelynn - they nerfed her stealth. You opinion of Evelynn comes extremely close to what many more people say about Katarina, except that the other people understand that "low skill-cap" and "low skill-floor" are entirely different things. Simply put, every skill cap increases as each new update happens, regardless of who it is meant to target, as it changes the scene you exist in and thus how you compete against that enemy. As an assassin, Evelynn has to pay close attention to her enemies, creating a dynamic game when facing opponents of a worthy or difficult caliber.

This being said, if you have seen what I said about "Eve OP" a while back, I had pointed out that people were not ready to face Evelynn because she is totally new to them and requires a more active attention than most people were used to. Back then, the new Kat just popped up, TF was somewhat popular, and if you notice, Ahri was, too. Ganking mid laners were "the bomb", but Evelynn kept getting QoL and utility buffs while other mids were nerfed by changes to Abyssal Scepter, Ahri got less base damage (more scalings, very minor changes) new TF look made people keep playing him, Kat got a scaling nerf in favorite of early base damages, then her ratios got nerfed, and finally, people became bored of playing TF. Meanwhile Evelynn buffs, and more passive gold means roaming is slightly better, but she is great at farming despite her roaming powers, so she, too, is being adjusted.

The only reason I explain this to you is because it has a point to me because statements are biased. That is what I disagree on - the usefulness of bias.