Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-4881935-20130327060139/@comment-3308937-20130404165410

I don't see how expecting some quality and thought in our decisions means that I'm running some sort of totalitarian site.

An opinion from a plumber means more to me than from some fry cook's if I need new pipes in my house; the same way someone with 500 quality edits' opinion is probably going to mean to more than the opinion of some guy with 500 comments about nothing when it comes to an editing discussion. The same way a pro player's in-depth analysis of a champion influences people more than some Bronze V guy saying that he likes some champ because he thinks they're strong because they got a bunch of kills with them in a couple of games. The same way a Senator's opinion on a subject is going to be taken more seriously by the President than some random guy's on the street.

Majority voting, in most cases, is a hot mess. We strive for quality on the wiki, not following what some baseless, supposed majority thinks.