Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-1990160-20130325231534/@comment-4593717-20130326201232

I have a no real way of wording this, so it will come out as I attempt it make it sound correct.

You guys are right. I'll go on record and say that I guess users do need to provide reasoning and opinions in order to back up their votes in order to ensure honesty and accuracy of a vote.

That still leaves one question of mine needing to be answered. what prevents a grouping of more respected users/mods/admins who grouped together and put down opinions as inadequate or incorrect? If this group were in agreement on a subject they could easily single-handedly run the Wiki without any other input. I'm not saying that this happens now, but it might some day in the future. So how would we prevent this should it ever come to pass? (this question doesn't really belong in this thread I guess, but it's slgihtly pertinent and important all the same).

Thanks all for bearing with me on this one. I can be a bit stubborn, but I'm always just seeking to get the right thing done.