Thread:Odaswifteye/@comment-3017217-20141229174218/@comment-5955640-20141231190239

Ntoulinho wrote: Being an Undergraduate(first semester) Student in Economic Sciences you can be sure I am as practical as someone can get.

The thing is people in general do not want to invest effort/time and want the easy way out instead of carring about finding the best choice.

Changes = lim → 0- = nerf

Changes =  lim → 0+ = buff

Tanks in general got hit under the belt the one in the least worse spot is maybe Rammus

That's obvious while also not being entirely true. People will play the easiest champ with the best results. But that usually just says they'll play Lee Sin or Vi (Warwick?). Which ends the disucssion right there. But there are people who just play the champion they like to play regardless of whether or not they are really good.

This still feels relative to me. If you want to make a case for some champs being better worse picks than others they always were so it's kind of irrelevant. Play the champ or don't.

If you want to use your economics knowledge to crunch the numbers on all the champions in the game you can do that. I would not consider it a valuable use of your skills though.