User:TehAnonymous/Talk

Greetings,. This is Teh's Talk page. Feel free to leave me a message at the bottom of this page, and please remember to sign them with ~.

LoL site coorporate
Hi, I'm admin from new chinese LoL wikia site can I request you to provided a site here basic template and code for me because the new site is need time faster build it Our Site. This dite is under Garena. Ericwong99 (talk) 14:29, March 20, 2015 (UTC)

troll on chat
Dunno if you're on right now, but a mod would be appreciated with User:Are You Freakin' Kidding Me in chat. http://i.imgur.com/qE8J5AO.png?1 – Mylittlewut, Friendship is Questionable 03:14, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sONfxPCTU0 21:07, February 10, 2015 (UTC)

Useful wiki scripts that we may use
I found some script that we should consider adding.

(seen here)

This script lets users load external images from other sites.

PROS: It will allow users to post images in their comments without the fear of not having the files properly named and tagged. And it also doesnt clutter the file uploads page. People can upload files if they wish (only if they follow the naming and tagging rule), this is just a nicer option to have.

CONS: It may be abused by some people and upload picture links that aint appropriate.

What are your thoughts? And should we make a thread about this? --Tesla Effect (talk) 04:09, February 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * I've been thinking of the same thing for a while now - removing personal images is a good direction, though whether it's the best method is up for discussion~ 21:07, February 10, 2015 (UTC)

Ntoulinho Spamming On Message Walls
Ntoulinho's been spamming "Please" for the past three weeks on Kyubey X Eve's message wall. Could you look into this? He's had a history of badgering users on their message walls before, and this doesn't look like healthy behavior. --Willbachbakal (talk) 23:44, February 12, 2015 (UTC)

Katarina's 2nd Classic Skin
Teh.

If Katarina has a new (3rd) classic skin, why there is no "2nd Classic Skin" at Katarina (Background; Development)? I have saw that "2nd Classic Skin" before. Thanks for asking, I don't know how to deal with those.

~Ririko Kagome (talk) 09:22, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
 * Updated. Refer to the history of File:Katarina OriginalSkin.jpg. It should have a history of what the file used to be. We don't have a perfectly coherent system of naming old images, but it's now located at File:Katarina OriginalSkin old2.jpg. 21:26, February 16, 2015 (UTC)

ClariS Acting Up Again
ClariS decided to make another threat on the cost efficiency discussion. Knowing them, I'm pretty sure that's going to lead to another spree of deletes/undos across the wiki's item articles. In the interest of saving a lot of time and effort, could you have a word with ClariS? They're not going to stop having this kind of disruptive behavior unless made to. --Willbachbakal (talk) 21:45, February 19, 2015 (UTC)

ClariS has started vandalising item pages and clogging up the edit feed. They also tried to abuse their position as a moderator and tried to intimidate me into not reverting their edits. You should get onto this as soon as you can.

EDIT: Oh, and as icing on the cake, ClariS is also edit warring on those same articles. Why is this user a moderator again? --Willbachbakal (talk) 01:40, February 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay. Removal stands. Future of cost efficiency suggested as a table on Gold efficiency. 04:52, February 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Why, though? The consensus on the thread made for the latest discussion pointed more towards reformatting them, and not towards their removal. This decision flies in the face of everything that was discussed there. The consensus was also that cost analyses were worth keeping, so there is no real reason to get rid of them aside from ClariS's vandalism spree. --Willbachbakal (talk) 05:17, February 20, 2015 (UTC)

Gold Efficiency
Sry, bad english. This website is really confuse... blog, discussion, message wall being a page... have to edit this page to talk with you... really sry i don't know what i am talking about... So, can i put things about gold efficiency in the items pages?

How i sign this? why there is so many modes to edit one page? omg... --Thiagola92 (talk) 15:27, February 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Try reading this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Namespace Basically, each one of those "namespaces" you mention is a different type of content, with different rules and uses. For gold efficiency, I would advise staying away from the subject. It's fairly controversial around here, and you may or may not ruffle some feathers. With regards to editing modes, I'm not sure what you mean. Ar you referring to Rich Text Editor vs Source Mode Editor? If so, I recommend the Source Mode editor to better understand how pages work. I use an old-style of talk page because I dislike MessageWall, an extension of the basic Wiki software. 23:21, February 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * If i'm not wrong there is VisualEditor, Rich-editor and Source editor. I do like source editor but somehow didn't look that simple to use templates on him (will try to learn other time). Now will read the link you pass, thank you for the answer. Thiagola92 (talk) 09:39, February 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * EDIT: Where should i ask for questions like "should i put the total damage of mordekaiser W if the enemy stay 6 seconds in range?"?
 * That would be a more stylistic question. We have a Manual of Style, but we don't use it much. For some things, like abilities that modify autoattacks, it is better to list "bonus damage" (ex. +20% AD), rather than to list "total damage 120% of AD" as it's displayed in the game, because it's more clear on the point that the autoattack is being modified. For cases like this, I would say to consider if the total damage is truly relevant - that is, is it likely that an enemy will remain in Mordekaiser's W AoE for the full duration (including every tick of damage)? My answer would be no. Compare this to something like poison (Teemo, Cassiopeia) or Ahri's Fox-Fire, where the full damage over time / full damage is relevant. 15:09, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * Who should i ask this type of questions? I read a little the Manual of Style but i'm not sure if there would have the answer for most of the questions. In the Range page tell me that the range from a targeted skill is the distance between the center to the other center (center of the hitbox, right?), but have being changed to be edge to edge. If i don't understood something wrong or the range page is not right or the zilean E page is not actually right about the range. Well, this will be the last question i don't wanna come here to ask you something every day, thank you for everything. Thiagola92 (talk) 17:25, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * Try texttip. 18:43, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

Uploaded pictures arent showing up
So I want today to see any new updates (one of which are the file updates), when I stumbled on a problem. I just couldnt find the little window on the right side of the wiki that usually shows the latest updated files. Is this a new thing the wikia all have to accept or is this a personal problem. Need to know since thats how I usually edit any new files posted with categories and copywrights thing by scrolling that page. --Tesla Effect (talk) 18:13, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't say that I'll miss that box. Use Special:Log/upload, Special:NewFiles, and/or Special:UncategorizedFiles instead. 15:10, March 5, 2015 (UTC)

Test
StealthTeh (talk) 05:00, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Retest StealthTeh (talk) 05:04, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Test was fail 01:53, March 22, 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Any reason as to why you undid all my categorization and page edits for creatures, factions, lore in general? I put a lot of time and effort into making all those edits, and seeing them all being deleted like that without any reason is absurd. I demand a valid reason for this action. Also, in regards to the Noxian army photo, it aint speculation if two devs confirmed it was Noxus!link1,link2, Noxians attacking Bard Mountain confirmed 3.--Tesla Effect (talk) 23:36, March 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Superfluous and completely unnecessary. I mean If you're going to indicate that the army is Noxian, it would be prudent to reference it, when the video provides zero context for specific groups. Also, one of your links is far stronger than the other two. To expand on "completely unnecessary", those categorizations and templates have zero gameplay relevance, zero validation, and non-zero duplication of categorization and organization (probably the biggest factor here). Adding species&etc. is more relevant in a more developed setting, e.g. Star Wars, where races/factions/groups are quite clearly defined with a large cast of individuals belonging to those groups. League, on the other hand, is a medley of singletons which makes general categorization (ex. "Ursine", "Rat") quite unnecessary. 00:45, March 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * There is a difference between places and factions (places are only geographical in nature, while factions are political bodies and groups). Also The Order of The Shadows was the order made by Zed, that page should not have been deleted. While I guess I can agree with that creatures thing to not be necessary, it will be in the future, same with the culture tag, once the lore starts chugging up for all people to see. I thought that everyone knew it was Noxus at this point, seeing as Bards Q&A was pretty well followed, Ill keep that in mind in the future when obscure confirmed things pop up. --Tesla Effect (talk) 00:55, March 25, 2015 (UTC)

Your actions regarding of gold income
First you made the page as a mere redirect to the "god" article gold that is too long and is not much else than list of items/runes/masteries. Then as I reverted the change back with groundings as it has valid purpose (contains more information than subsection in gold page, is a effect/buff, it is a own subsection of items) you deleted the article, along with HOURS OF WORK and made it a mere redirect again. No groundings, no conversations, no preserving of information. Mind restoring the content somewhere where from I can copy it as it was the only version made and upkeeped. BlackSmith (talk) 19:04, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * Content was not provided in a standardized page fashion nor provides objective information. It contains substantial theorycrafting, which is not something included on mainspace articles. 06:24, March 27, 2015 (UTC)