Talk:Ashe/@comment-24215867-20131126031742/@comment-24212263-20131212013609

"LCSunderpowered you really like to argue for no reason don't you?"

Well I stated first that runnans is pretty bad in general and got a lot of disagreements and arguements even.

"Idc how you judge "viability" because the reason you stated is stupid. You gauge viability based off of what you see/hear pro's play/say and that's stupid especially when talking about item viability. There are niche items (which I consider Runaan's to be) that are far more flexible than niche champions. Runaan's is useful if your team lacks wave clear or has very bad aoe/damage output."

Not just what pros say. Every challenger adc (or even high elo in general)would tell you runnans is bad. This is also similar to justifying the usefullness of Fiora top lane. Is Fiora meant for top? Yes. Is she good in general? No. Is she situational? Close to 0 situations. Can Fiora work in Solo Queue? Anything works in solo queue.

If judging the viability based on the competative scene is stupid, then how else are you going to judge anything. By solo queue? I already stated that solo queue is a very flawed reference since anything could happen in suah c broad definition. The only data is win rate percentage which is flawed on it's own being just a statistic.

"Seriously though dude/dudette just make a blog about "Why Runaan's is bad" or something and we can argue about it there."

Like I said the arguement came to me "Your description of  Runaan's Hurricane is incorrect. It does not halve your dps, but rather it has the potential to double your dps, when hitting three targets, still dealing full damage to the primary target." and if you'd like we can just stop here and not direct anymore attacks towards anyone.