Talk:Katarina/@comment-195.235.105.231-20120404093151/@comment-58.33.91.64-20120410133312

" "Lol it's not a fallacy because people agree that "Scarra" and "TiensiNoAkuma" are experts and since there is more than one high elo player of katarina (also dont 4get about the countless players who arent mentioned) there is a general consensus on the subject and so on and so forth."

It totally IS a fallacy! Why? Because that consensus is STILL QUITE SUBJECTIVE and you're still relying on it as a crutch for the rest of your argument!

Saying "X is good with Y" does not mean "Y is good in general".

The viability of Katarina for pros is VERY VERY DIFFERENT from the viability of Katarina in Normal and lower ELO than High. If you're arguing for her ability to win in High ELO, I won't question it. The evidence is there.

She's a bad champion to play outside of some very niche roles. She needs some improvements or at least changes to the priorities in her kit.

But hey, if you want to stick to your flawed form of thinking, you're free to do so."

Actually, you're right. The problem is, you've strayed from your initial argument. Your initial argument was that there were NO high elo Kats. So stop making yourself look stupid and make sure you're on the same page as everyone else.