Thread:ClariS/@comment-3459498-20140524082137/@comment-1330314-20140630034935

The problem wasn't so much what occurred around the discussion, but the discussion itself, which hardly amounted to a discussion at all. The moment I tried to explain my rationale, you interrupted me, instantly rejected my arguments, then sidetracked into points that were irrelevant to the matter at hand, thereby losing the admin. You have done the same in other discussions monitored by admins, and are more than likely to do so again.

Considering that you were proven wrong across three different discussions, I don't really need to hear any more about your position than I already have, particularly as it has no bearing on anything whatsoever at this point. You, on the other hand, are expecting me to come to you, repeat everything I said in every previous discussion pertaining to this subject, and justify my logic under your objections, which you have so far made without ever even beginning to try to listen to me. It is not my job to validate the wiki's current policy regarding cost analyses, nor is it my job to explain to you how things work. If you are unable to get with the program and make an effort on your part to understand why you were wrong and a new system was put in place, that is a problem you have to deal with on your own.

"What Demise wanted to do" is also debatable. I thought the aim of the discussion was to find some common ground regarding items and gold value (not likely to ever happen), but as it turned out the discussion had no clear goal, no meaningful progression, and minimal moderation. The conversation had devolved into a shouting contest, and that was with Demise in it. Even if she somehow manages to keep the discussion in control, what is there to do? There's clearly not going to be any agreement between us two, and what little motivation I had to try and convince you is now gone. It's up to you to figure out why the new system beats yours and, if you can't do it, that's just too bad.