Talk:Madred's Bloodrazor/@comment-120.28.205.161-20120807005156

everyone in here is in the illusion that usually most carries should buy MBR... IMO the off tank should by MBR why

1. off tanks usually go for enemy carry which doesnt build mr or armour directly since they would either build damage first(either ap or ad depending on the carry) or what i would call an anti-carry off tank. and they usually have the gap closer to close the distance between them and the carry

2. off tanks benefit more from the bonus armor, as and ad how ever small it is because they have the sustain to stay in the fight long enough to use most of it. MBR if used on an ad carry the other team knowing they arent stupid would always take down the ad carry first.

3. off tanks if not anti-carry would defend their carry from assassin types like akali, yi or kassadin or some other, which in my own opinion still will not build armor or mr immediately.

4. if the off tank could last the entire clash. it is easier for him to take down the tank since no one in freaking hell would take down the tank first unless its the one carrying the game, in which case the tank has the most hp and would more or less proc the %percent damage of MBR.

IMO i build off tank on jarvan i know it might not be as strong as you think but when i build MBR on him i can take down most carries (if done correctly) before they can do lethal damage... the thing is dont rush MBR unless you are a magic dps champ like WW (even so i dont rush MBR on my WW)...

Any Viloent reactions are welcome as replies....