User talk:Luckyvampire

Hey there Luckyvampire!

I put together the massive model viewer change thats been discussed with some of the admins. We've moved the link to a new model viewer that should be much easier to use and will also be linking back to the wiki on their end to bring us more users. A wim/win.

Since there was such a large change, there was a brief window where names were messed up. That should all be fixed by now. However, if you mean the images themselves not appearing correctly, that is a completely unrelated bug that is known and is currently being worked on. We are hoping to get that fixed asap.

Best, Jorge (profile)•(talk) 21:21, July 11, 2012 (UTC)

Shurelia & Randuin
Hey Lucky,

Some anon undid your statement for Shurelia & Randuin. My question is: is there any source for them being married? If you have it, post it on Shureria's page, or edit the page. For now, the statement will stay that they're married.

Reilock (talk) 19:51, July 12, 2012 (UTC)Reilock

Hey, you!
You should pop your head into chat sometime. Kelberry (talk) 11:46, July 27, 2012 (UTC)

Opera Sona
Unless you can prove that Sona will receive a new skin called "Opera", otherwise I'm afraid the addition to Champion skin/Skin themes may be deemed nonconstructive. -- Inpursuit (talk) 15:06, August 1, 2012 (UTC)

I didn't add that browser triva and I've seen people mentioning Opera Sona so much I've forgotton there is no skin like that yet... my bad :) Luckyvampire (talk) 15:40, August 1, 2012 (UTC)

Edit Summaries
While you may disagree with other editors on certain suggestions, especially on subjective pages such as strategy ones, please refrain from belittling their opinions by calling it "moronic" or "idiotic" in the future. Thank you. LionsLight (talk) 15:04, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

RE:Diana's Trivia
Sorry about the Diana trivia page. I wasn't aware of any discussion about this. I'm not a fan of the show but i actually don't hate it (Persoanlly I don't even know their names) I just thought this was just something the random anons had thought of. This won't happen again Armegdon (talk) 21:03, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Re: User: 99.47.246.179
I undid this block as I believe that as opposed to performing edits with intent to vandalise he is merely misinformed (thinking Nami's long-range ult is global) and Pantheon's ult is in the same category as Nocturne's and TF's (which shares the same range as Gate). LionsLight (talk) 13:54, April 13, 2013 (UTC)

Re:V3.6 patch notes
Don't update the wiki until the servers actually go down to implement the patch. As it currently stands right now, neither of these champion pages are accurate if they claim that the reworks are live. http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb1366976924/common/avatars/thumb/e/ee/1445357.png/20px-1445357.png LionsLight (talk) 07:39, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

The patch is LIVE on EUWest and EUEast servers - I seriously doubt NA will get a different patch. --Luckyvampire (talk) 08:40, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * While NA will receive the same patch, the rationale was that as we are primarily focused on the NA client, our information will not match the ingame data for NA players who want to check up on things in between games. Until of course Riot takes down the NA servers. http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb1366976924/common/avatars/thumb/e/ee/1445357.png/20px-1445357.png LionsLight (talk) 09:08, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

Why did you revert my changes to the Runebook page?
They made it more factually correct and less opinionated.

I added the justification in the edit summary and in a comment (because the wall of text didn't fit in the edit summary ;) ) .   (ugh, bad at wikia formatting; hopefully it's now put in its own section...)

edit: unless you can convince me otherwise, I'll probably later this week re-fix the incorrect statement and replace the negative "runecombiner sux" type of opinion part by something like the more neutral/wiki-like "The cheapest you can combine a Tier 3 rune for is 375 IP.   Since the more expensive Tier 3 runes seem to be more rare to get from the rune combiner, it won't often give you a benefit over straight up buying runes in the store unless you're using it to start out a collection of every rune type available, irregardless of their usefullness in game."

SDMarukokun (talk) 06:42, May 13, 2013 (UTC)


 * You changed "Certain runes do not appear to be available" to "Certain runes appear to be more rare", unless you are certain ALL runes can be obtained from the rune combiner the first statement is correct.


 * But do change runes listed as unavailable if you've got the combiner to produce them and other parts of the page you think aren't neutral.


 * --Luckyvampire (talk) 08:11, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmm, a similar claim could be made about listing types of runes along with a "Certain runes do not appear to be available" statement...  (you'd have to do combines to hundreds of tier3 runes to make meaningfull claims about which ones might not be produced at all by the rune combiner.   I used the logic jump "if 1 type of penetration _does_ get produced, but is just rare, likely the same is true for the other types as well".  Maybe that's too big a jump, but scrapping one and leaving the others looks just odd...   Maybe it should be something like "Certain runes appear to be very rarely generated by the rune combiner, if at all.   This seems to mostly apply to the more expensive types of Tier 3 runes." and leave out specific rune types, since those are hard to prove/disprove with the randomness and expensiveness of the rune combiner?..  (don't have something like 200K IP lying around to do meaningfull tests/statistics.  Even figuring out the Dominion IP bonus would be an easier task than figuring out the distribution of generated runes... )
 * I guess I'll think up what I think would be a good complete text for that one bullet point and then run it by you here first to prevent an edit + revert war...
 * SDMarukokun (talk) 10:05, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Reverted changes on Vayne W ability.
Vayne page now displays a wrong W description. Check in-game description, please. I've change text on wikia but you reverted it. Check the history again, the right one is here: http://leagueoflegends.wikia.com/wiki/Vayne?oldid=1796163

Teer (talk) 12:39, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * verbatim is the base, but then reformatted in order to clarify/make concise. In the current example, the wiki description includes "consuming" the rings, which is a significant difference, in that it describes more exactly how the ability functions. TL;DR COPY PASTE BAD CLARIFICATION GOOD 19:36, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for feedback. Looks like I should give up here, because English isn't my native languge. However, Vayne W descriptions is still wrong, and could confuse newbies. Hope someone will fix it soon.
 * Teer (talk) 21:55, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

About Infinite blocks
These are blocks to IPs who decided to edit multiple pages. I don't think the length of said block really matters in that regard.

What, are they complaining that they got banned for changing Fiora's champion description to "Useless Minion" and Ashe's to "Cumdumpster"?

--Tiffy (talk) 14:32, June 13, 2013 (UTC)