Talk:Lucian/@comment-4729118-20130824221802/@comment-8165289-20130825084811

BotRK gives 40% attack speed,  that's 1,9 extra bullets.

It also gives 25 ad (even less than I thought, 40). So yeah, that's 1.019 attack speed. 25 bonus ad (only bonus ad in the ult, on level six). Ult deals 700,... damage this way.

OR You pick a BT. 100 bonus ad gives 25 bonus damage per bullet. 0.764 attack speed. Oh, that's 860 damage. So for ultimate, BT is better than BotRK.

Q gets 120 extra damage with BT instead of the 30 Blade would give. W gives 60 instead of 15.

So, I get it if you wanna say that BotRK empowers your auto-attack in such a way that it's better than BT. Well, let's say you are going to fight versus a Vayne level 10. Not even 1200 hp... 5% of 1200 is... 60. So how is 60+25 more then 100? Let's see when Vayne has 500 hp, then you only get 50 bonus damage from the Blade, while the Bloodthirster still gives 100.

On your passive, you get 12,5+60 on a full health Vayne, 12,5+25 for a 500 hp Vayne (break even point is on 750 health, over the half). I see this is 22,5 more then Bloodthirster on a full health, but still 12,5 less on a low health Vayne.

Difference on a whole autoattack seems to be 7,5 in favor of the BotRK on a 1200 hp Vayne, but 62,5 in favor of the BT on a 500 hp Vayne.

So yeah, even your auto-attacks aren't better off with BotRK. Also, why would you need attack speed when you've got 5 or more procs on your passive..? Look, I wanna be convinced that the active compensates all these downsides. But I'm not.

Note: Math might be wrong sometimes, I'm not God.