Thread:U N Ovvrn/@comment-3308937-20141227054923/@comment-9705522-20150109214311

Ntoulinho wrote: i could very well claim that the dictionaries of the 2 highest ranked Universities by QS Rankings are standard since they agree (Oxford, Cambridge)

Ok excuse me I am removing the 6 above comments and editing the seventh.

Please give me the verb which by your dictionary does not relate the action with illicit actions but still is synonymous with attack.

If semantics were "fluid","flexible" formal languages would crumble. Sorites paradox... Its irrelevant, so i wont. Also, appeal at authority, logical fallacy. Definitions cannot be rules. They would create impossible scenarios.

No, formal languages wouldnt crumble. After all, we already have that. Words have many different meanings, depending on context, mimic, gesture and so on. Sarcams being quite an important factor. But as I said, its of no relevance.