Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1990160-20140521040036/@comment-1330314-20140523140339

Deshiba wrote: I just remember that voting on something is how we resolved issues in the past. I wasn't aware that the moral purism movement had absolved democracy on this wiki altogether. Forgive me and my obsolete archaic standards.

Putting aside the fact that this has nothing to do with the discussion, you are in no position to claim the moral high ground, Deshiba. You claim to adhere to democracy, but you try to cheat the data when democracy doesn't suit you.

As someone who happens to be on the winning side of the votes, I can tell you that although the wiki is edited by multiple different users in concert, decisions like these are not formed on a vote but on a final decision hinging on the quality of the argumentation on both sides. It's pretty much a formal debate. I would rather preserve the cost analyses on this wiki (and on the item pages) through solid reasoning, which is why I want to keep on with this discussion, though even on that side it looks like the "against removal" camp has the advantage as well.