Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-1990160-20130325231534/@comment-1915726-20130326232735

KarasuGamma wrote:

Edit count isn't everything. What if the person with over 100 made most of their edits as minor grammar and style fixes, while the person with under 10 is a new user who has already made significant, useful contributions? Just because someone hasn't had much of a chance to prove their worth doesn't mean they should be counted as worthless.

In order for a user to join the discussion, we won't want the threshold to be too unreachable. So any constructive contribution as minor as grammar or spelling fixes suffices. There is rarely a case that a user new to one Wiki could make a dramatic improvement to some long standing issue, unless this guy is a Wikia staffer.