Thread:Mercenary Crave/@comment-3459498-20141114030110/@comment-3459498-20141115002031

I would not actually go so far as to say "legal channels". If you check both of your nominations, they're actually quite underhanded in that both times a clear majority was not met - 4/2 for mod, in which discussion was completely ignored and the end result was overturned by the person who did so, obviously raising concerns of bias, as well as the chat mod which had a stunning 8-5 (not what I'd call a clear majority, particularly because one oppose was removed and one or two users in support were not really integrated in any wiki activity).

To your second point, and this is extremely important: Just because Teh is on good terms with you, it does not make you invulnerable to peer review. You cannot simply appeal to a friend to bail you out of trouble (as Nystus was doing with you). And, just because the issue was brought to Teh before - who, may I add, was personally responsible for your promotion to moderator without consensus outside of the light of day - it does not mean that the issue is completely irrelevant. He is not the sole source of administrative review and jurisdiction, nor should he be treated as such.

To a degree I'm concerned of your views that the wiki operates as a stepladder: In particular, saying that as an administrator I have no right authority to make decisions when given reports in the same way Teh was given a report.