Talk:Aatrox/@comment-Roxai-20130511072839/@comment-SimplyCactus-20130512121514

@DerangedShadow "You do realize that the creativity is significant compared to other games"

Actually it isn't. Look at DotA or Dota 2. And no, I don't want to start a Dota vs LoL war here, I myself prefer to play LoL. But I have to give Dota one thing -> the uniqness and creativity of the champions there is way, WAY better than in LoL.

Some examples:

1. Invoker. His Q,W,E are different elements and by mixing 3 of them them you can invoke a different spell (with R). In total he has 14 spells to choose from. Totally unique mechanic making him both hard to play and very versatile.

2. Rubick. His ultimate is to copy any last used ability of an opponent. How insane is that? Very versatile and each game with him feels different because obviously with different opponents you can steal different abilities.

3. Morphling. He can freely convert his damage/health ratio. So he can be a tank with almost no damage or a very squishy high damage dealer. Or something in between. You decide.

4. Meepo. This hero splits into maximum 4 copies as he levels up his ultimate. The copies are permanent. But if any one dies then they all die. You can do crazy stuff with this. Jungling with two copies while laning different lanes with other two? no problem! well, that is if you have enough skill to do that...

THIS is what I call unique. This is uniqueness on a whole different level than LoL champions. So stop making excuses for LoL, stop saying stuff like "there is a limited number of new things they can make". I disagree. If Dota can be way more creative then why LoL can't?