Talk:Kindred/@comment-24795478-20151024044826/@comment-26459891-20151024132633

- Not quite. You build for your passive, that is attack speed, on-hit, over raw AD and crits like other marksmen (in this sense, the Kayle comparison you made is quite appropriate). In other words, you need to stack up your passive, as it's gonna be your main source of damage.

- They're also very good at taking objectives, and fairly good at splitpushing. They bring only damage because that's what marksmen do.

- The only thing I slightly agree with you about is that they're kinda "feast or famine", even tho that term makes it sound much more extreme than how it actually is. It's pretty pitiful to fall behind with them, but you've got 6 "safe" stacks, so even if you're bad at guessing people who'll die with your mark, you'll get enough damage eventually, so you can always catch up. Also their ulti is gold agnostic, so if you're good with that you'll be useful no matter what.

The "Never seen any successful Kindred" part is quite an unnecessary piece of information. Of course that's just your experience. I've seen many succesful Kindreds, I've played many succesful Kindred games, and I've had and seen plenty of bad Kindred games.

When they snowball, it's really overwhelming.