Thread:Double Slap/@comment-3017217-20150501142244/@comment-4091261-20150506202346

Ok, well your refrence had 0.99^a so I naturally assumed as such. If the quote said 0.99009901^a I would have assumed that instead. There was no way I would have gotten the number, 0.99009901. Out of curiousity, is the number derived from 1/1.01? If so, I think it would be more accurate to simply use (1/1.01)^a rather than the rounded constant.

Aside from that, 20x damage and 5x is still overtuned. Normally damage resistance at 300 armor is 75% and at 170 armor it is 62.96%. From 4x the damage to 1.59x the damage. The difference is massive. Too massive to even be considered. The resistance at 170 armor with the new model is more than the resistance at 300 armor in the current system. There needs to be another way to offset this change because 5x the damage is still more than 4x the damage.