Talk:Lux/@comment-8506165-20130626192031/@comment-8506165-20130627110322

Passive procs and shorter R cooldown means Lux deals more damage overall.

Full Lux combo including only a single passive proc from R = 1190 damage + 205% AP

Full Liss combo = 1045 damage + 255% AP (assuming her incredibly obvious E isn't dodged)

What's the difference? Lux can do hers every 24 seconds. Liss can do hers every 48 seconds even if she has max CDR which she doesn't tend to go for. Add in that Liss has to itemise more defensively to compensate for her abysmal spell range and yeah, I'm not seeing how she deserves nerfs when Lux is left as she is. She has a single-target stun and AoE slow in her R, a 1.5 second snare, and a single-target slow that's less effective than Lux's. Lux has a longer-ranged slow, double multi-target barrier, a longer-ranged snare that averages as the same duration to two targets, and a ridiculously low-cooldown ultimate that can hit halfway across the map. At best their utility is comparable but Lux just puts out more damage from safer range.

Yeah, I'm QQing a bit. It's just annoying to see an interesting new champion nerfed with a justification that doesn't stand up to scrutiny - look at Lux who's probably the best comparison and she's untouched by the nerfhammer. I honestly think she's fine aside from her ultimate CD being too low.