User blog comment:Shadowlord723/Randall - The Arcane Spellmaster/@comment-26263213-20160912124011/@comment-26203093-20160915144756

Not absurd at all. If you've played it long enough to know how complex the game is, it takes a  pretty large amount to get any kind of reaction.

" By no means does a negative aspect of a pre-existing article warrant the excusability of another article's negative aspects, nor does its existence disprove its own inherent negativity."

If I don't see it as a negative aspect, there's nothing to excuse, nor does your opinion prove inherent negativity. And you've done nothing to convince me.

You're assuming inherent negativity. I don't. Therefore it is excusable. Not by you, clearly, but you've also not made an argument, just weighed your opinion more highly.

And if you've not got a problem with a negative aspect of a pre-existing article, then what's absurd is excusing the pre-existing one, and not the new one, because at that point, negativity is arbitrarily assigned. Not actually inherent.

Hence: a question.