Talk:Fizz/@comment-4530717-20130520173017/@comment-4834593-20130526145323

So, the disagreements right here are Trynd being easy or hard to play, Fizz having a weak lane or not, and Varus being better than most AD carries or not, right?

Trynd being easy/hard to play: He's one of the hardest champions in the game to play. This because, to deal his (huge) damage, he (as squishy) needs to get into melee range of his enemies, who will always want to focus him. If not done carefully, this means the need to near-instantly ult, and most likely a 5 second cc lock.

Fizz having weak lane or not: He can kill most enemies really easy early game, granting him a (normally) easy lane. Only long range pushers like Morgana or Malzahar are likely to be a problem.

Varus better/worse than most AD carries: I'd say the pick/ban rates on the EU LCS say enough. Varus is #1 there, of all AD carries. And just look at his kit. Nice %health damage, basically a ranged Amumu ultimate, and above average range. Did I mention his long range snipe and easier-to-land-than-to-intentionally-miss poke already? Or his bonus damage on autoattacks?