User blog comment:ClariS/Blaming Others/@comment-137.226.66.4-20120326070439/@comment-4842032-20120330231335

I'm a lvl 30 who actively participates in the Tribunal, and although I can't speak for every 'jury' member, I can say this:

1. I give junglers a higher leniency than other positions, since the skill required is, I believe, higher, the stress is greater, and they are the person most dependent on their teammates.

2. I am much more likely to Punish if the other team also reported. ** If the other team gives me a detailed comment, I nearly always end up Punishing.**

3. The problem with "Negative Attitude" claims is that they nearly always start with game-play, which is a facet of the game 'juries' can only guess at. If they have 8 deaths at a 22-minute surrender, that's easy, but 13 deaths in a 45-minute game? Much harder to tell, especially if they are a role other than carry and their KDA is reasonable.

My Suggestions: A timeline for KDA. It would make it MUCH easier to tell what was going on in a game. People almost never chat the details I would want to see to make a decision, and I can't trust them to have the details correct.