Talk:Kha'Zix/@comment-5334902-20131030144720/@comment-9705522-20131120153137

mmh, no. your theory is still wrong. after all, remember how it worked with botrk? you didnt get a stack from botrk. in this case we have an autoattack from kha with passive, muramana, and botrk. muramana is only applied once. so we have autoattack, applies cleaver stack. muramana, according to your theory should apply cleaverstack (its wrong though). and botrk, doesnt apply stack. so with that we get ... 2 stacks. not 3. and the final nail in the coffin for your theory? draven. if you use his q and muramana you get a whooping ... 1 stack. so yeah. your theory is wrong.