Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1876049-20150731182500/@comment-1330314-20150801140544

Vsagent wrote: The purpose of this wikia IS to merely note down information. Riot should be worring about informing and helping both new and old players. There is a point in having the Strategy page: to note down the official strategic information Riot posted. Why is there also flavour content on those pages? I couldn't know, but I'm FOR removing it.

I actually think it would be worth removing Strategy pages entirely, as those happen to be super-dependent on itemization, meta and heavily changeable and subjective information, none of which pertains at all to any official information given by Riot. By contrast, just because champion bios are flavorful does not mean they are not giving valuable information, nor does it mean that the flavor text is wrong: calling slippery or  a trickster is flavorful, for example, but also entirely correct, and conveys accurate information to the player beyond simple numbers. I'm a Wiki purist too, but I think our capacity to note down information goes beyond simple number-porting.

Vsagent wrote: I'll now wait for Willbachbakal and Darksusanoo to accuse me of wanting to start a flame war or to dismiss my argument as flawed and with no value, because they're the judges here and we shall no oppose them. Really guys? You should be ashamed.

Well, no, you're totally free to disagree, and your disagreement is a good thing, as it would help set the bounds for this project and prevent us from going too nuts. What both GutsyTick and you are saying, however, is that you don't care for any opinions dissenting with you, no matter how numerous, and you yourself specifically mentioned you'd be willing to just tear down these bios as they'd pop up:

Vsagent wrote: About this, do you have actual permission to add those? Cause I don't want to get a warning for vandalising when I remove them.

(We got permission from NeonSpotlight, by the way)

It is this kind of attitude that isn't helpful to the wiki as a whole, and that simply creates unnecessary friction. If anything, you should be ashamed to think that your opinion entitles you to destroy the work of many more people. Again, you are more than welcome to disagree, and disagreement can be good for this project and the wiki (Feirund's post makes really good points that all need to be addressed, for example, and as such made a huge positive contribution to this discussion, as did Shaw's own posts), but there's a difference between disapproving of a project and going out of your own way to impede or belittle the people working on said project.