User blog comment:QuantumFeint/About how Fearless went full Urgot with Sona/@comment-3308937-20140729131956

In regards to the point of the blog I'd say that I generally disagree and having actually played Sona on the PBE think it's a good direction for her and anyone who likes being more than their team's "bitch" but I can't really take any specific points of yours to try and debate on because, to be blunt, your blog structure and formatting is a mess in regards to facilitating a discussion (which imo should be the point of blogs, to spark discussion).

If you're looking to improve then keep reading, if not then don't, simple as that, if not hopefully someone else can find this useful:

To start I'd suggest using actual numbers, stats, facts and actual examples instead of generalist phrases like "cut its effectivity by a lot," not only does it not provide any actual information on the subject it leaves no room for discussion because it's not a real unit of measure, "a lot" could mean something different to you than it does to me. Incorporating numbers and figures instead of just saying stuff like "this is a big nerf," "this sucks now," adds a sense of credibility to not only yourself but the blog and makes people more willing to discuss. Also, there really is no point to bring Fearless into this the way you did, like he's some sort of object you can talk about or at instead of a person you talk to, it comes off as whiny and sensationalist, like some bad Fox "Dear Mr. President" kind of thing.

Secondly, the size of the blog is just insane and ends up watering down and obscuring the main idea of it a lot. You should aim to cut down the bloating by removing the multitude of sentences that add nothing to the discussion other than to try and serve as sensationalist blabber to try and make people think a certain way because you lack the actual facts to do so, like your entire rant about E's ranking benefit being so low, it's just filler and, again, makes you come off as whiny and grasping for straws.

Third is your formatting and the lack of it, part of this ties in with the second point as some of it is caused by all the filler sentences and the lack of conciseness. This normally wouldn't be that big a deal but as is you tend to go off point in your sections, whether or not this is to obscure the fact that you lack actual figures and numbers I can't say but it does happen and it's very off-putting as a reader. This issue is mostly a personal problem where you have to try and stay on topic, some things to help alleviate it though include breaking down points into smaller sections or by incorporating actual formatting tools like bulleted/numbered lists, stylizing headers to make them stand out and, as a result, working to identify section breaks better by adding underlines, colors or even just bolding/italicizing.