Thread:Demise101/@comment-4022742-20141007060147/@comment-3459498-20141007080151

I suggest you get on chat and talk to me about this, I don't particularly like typing things up this way. But here's a short thing:


 * The second part of the policy feels very tacked on, as it twists the meaning of the actual guideline (annnnd we're into semantics). It should end with "Their intention is not to act only as a conversation starter", which is what a majority of your blogs (and many others) pretty much are. Yes, you can argue that you're putting a new twist in every time you flaunt your product on the side of the street, but at the end of the day what you really care about is the money/attention to get the money, and you're basically talking about the same thing with a bit added on.

I also don't appreciate your last comment, because it's pretty obviously painting myself and those who aren't involved and never likely will be as the bad guys who are against free speech. I'll withhold further comments for now.