Thread:BlackSmith/@comment-25771421-20160806101931/@comment-658634-20160815145013

FFS it did it again. fuck this, I am not wasting any more time for long and detailed answer.

According to teh anynomus numberings, 1. Strict definition will make silly pages. Either they have empty sections or too short sections. Rather use best practice of the article types and let the mlive as needed.

2. My previous post covered that already. Follow the MoS and remove the unnecessarily DABs from articles that clearly are top articles.

3. Linking templates have little to do with the mastery articles. They are fancy but hardly have impact how the pages should look or work. Those templates adapts on the article, not the otherway around.

4. Having a picture with links is quite enough. Make it fancier and you steal articles purpose.

5. Category page shows nicely articles against MoS in regards of DAB.

Thumb or rule, the fancier pages made, the less editors around.

@Tylobic, it's cool. What about idea of merging patch history and old versions to one section. Then each season section having corresponding patch history. When season changes, then just move old info under new header and start keeping track of that seasons patch impact on that mastery.