Forum:MoS specifying time wiki-wide

Few points regarding manual of style for time-related content. Discuss. &mdash;BryghtShadow 13:53, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) I've seen relative time phrases used on the wiki (e.g. "current", "old", "previous"). I want the wiki to start using specific times as much as possible for content (e.g. "2013 April 10" instead of "now"). For navigation between static content (patch notes), "previous" and "next" is fine because the successor of V1.0.0.138 is V3.5.
 * 2) For changed or removed content, specifying when it was introduced and/or when it got changed or was last active. I'm torn between (A) IntroducingPatch—ChangingPatch and (B) IntroducingPatch—LastActivePatch. For example, Karma before her V3.5 rework would be written as (A) V1.0.0.110—V3.5 and (B) V1.0.0.110—V1.0.0.138. What is more intuitive, what makes more sense, what notations if any?
 * 3) Specifying times for filenames when a new version gets added and we wish to keep the old as a separate file rather than a revision. For "[ Inner Flame old]" I think we should name it "Inner Flame V1.0.0.138" (the last patch that used this) or "Inner Flame V3.5" (the last patch that changed/removed this), whichever is more intuitive.