Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-25771421-20160713202832/@comment-1990160-20160718185521

Bug fixes vary in size, quantity, and documentation.

There's also a fuzzy line between bug fixing and quality of life - there are frequent? reddit posts & similar about how X champion has Y bugs that affect their playability. For instance, do you remember how Azir has been criticized on and off since release as buggy and unplayable? How would he have been received if those bug fixes weren't clearly documented and disseminated?

Regarding bug fixes that relate to the functionality of champions and their abilities, both the change itself and the documentation can affect that champion's performance and perception on the broader scale of the game.

Sure, minor visual fixes and corrections of unintended interactions are small, but they're pretty important to maintain consistency within a page. More broadly, such a change would further divide older & newer patch notes, and even more relevantly, this suggested separation of content would make changes less visible to anyone who cares or might care.

The current organization also makes it simpler to directly transfer sections from the patch notes to individual patch histories, which should be worth considering as the current de facto maintainer of patch notes (@Tylobic).