Talk:Draven/@comment-27355169-20161014220343/@comment-28977071-20161015095200

Regarding, the probable answer is a 'selection bias'. You like him so you noticed, neglecting all the other groups of 10 where he wasn't always present. There is an average of 1 group of N games per 1 game in the long run but you threw all those samples out. So the statistical result became distorted as you didn't remove the correlation with your personal choice. Plus the champ is the great spot currently so the bias made him just to step out from the front lines where he was already present.

Regarding, the probable answer is 'sheeple'. Guys saw few s on World's so they concluded hem ust be OP -_-