Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-5791947-20130303052109/@comment-3308937-20130304105633

I do have to emphasize that I have not started this purge yet

You do, I know you haven't but I'm sure a lot of contributors do not. Just realize I'm very devil's advocate-y when it comes to new mods, I don't want people doing things without thinking everything through for the health of the wiki. Your original post gives off the feeling that you are very set in your ways with the "stance is unacceptable" being just something you threw in to make it look a little better.

I think the big issue is how you present your opinions, it makes it sound like a declaration, not a proposal. If I were proposing this idea (using your credentials) I would've written it more like this:

Title: Custom champion purge proposal Hey guys. As some of you may have seen, LionsLight is currently purging user blogs that do not follow our user blog policies because they are a neglected section of the wiki full of blogs that just are not up to snuff when it comes to content. I have an idea to do the same with champion concepts. We have a problem with Custom Champion Concepts (from here out known as CCC), they are as large in number as blogs and we currently do not have policies, nor do we moderators, moderating them.

Like blogs there are some that rise above others in terms of the work put into them and the quality of the posts themselves and, on the other hand, there are some that are just, for lack of a better word, a mess with next to no work put into them and lackluster quality.

I, as a CCC creator, have some ideas on help improve the quality of our custom champion concepts and properly set up policies to help moderate the section.

I believe that if a concept is of poor quality and is older than 3 months it should be removed. Quality, in my eyes, means using champion templates, having proper grammar, being easy to read and having a sufficient amount of information. Images are not required but don't hurt if used in moderation. If the concept does not reach these standards it should be given 3 months, which I think is enough, to be refined to this standard.

Joke CCCs (like my Mary Sue are acceptable as long as the are of quality and, as always, CCCs should follow the Wiki's discussion policy. Duplicate champion concepts will be automatically removed as there is no reason for them to exist.

These are my ideas on what our CCC policies should be, if you have any other ideas or concerns please don't be afraid to post them.

TL;DR: We need custom champion concept policies like we do for blogs. My idea is that if a post doesn't have a champion template, has poor English and/or lacks content it should be given 3 months to be corrected or be removed.