Thread:NeonSpotlight/@comment-658634-20140528070852/@comment-658634-20140528151307

Years prior the World Wide Web we used Gopher for displaying content, if you actually sit down and familiarize yourself with it and it's used correctly, is much easier to follow whole discussions with it than with hypertext. Time has moved past from simple text to rich text format where bullets, tables and paragraphs live to make reading easier. Sorry to tell you but writing couple sentences intended with :'s is hardly a good tool for discussion something more detailed than 'Should you use image or file template'. The : method was great when there was no better. Now there is and are.

I don't see a issue when people like Will ground their posts and use his precious time to shape their toughs so that other would understand his message and to future reduce the risk of misunderstandings and even future reducing the personal conflicts. Its the opinions that clash, persons should not, but opinion without grounding is as good as a empty cake. No matter how much you sugar top it, it is still empty.

I do see a issue when you force people to use discussion channel where readers are forced to keep track on inditing instead of simply oh-everything-he-said-is-inside-this-blue-box and writers need to spend remarkably lot more time in formatting. Please do not do so in future.