Talk:Katarina/@comment-25660105-20141215074307/@comment-5077844-20141224091345

yeah, no, E really isn't predictable or anything. It's the only spell in the game that transports you instantly (well there's flash) without any windup or visible travel time. the only thing that comes close are LeBlanc and Zed, but they need to activate their spell first in order to blink. Kat just blinks in an instant and without any visual warning.

Saying her poke is bad tells me that either you aren't as good at Kat as you claim, or you're really just pulling out random counterarguments without basis. Max Q first, spam it whenever off cd, and start boots/3pots. Congrats, you can now successfully outtrade your lane in the long runbecause most mages will eventually run out of mana if they try to poke you down. Happens to Orianna, to Syndra, etc. Also, as long as you feel safe from junglers you can always use your E to dodge enemy spells which will set them back even further. If you don#t get a lead vs Kata you won't be doing much at all.

Yes, her farming isn't all thatgreat but Q and E is usually an easy waay t last hit stuff without getting yourself into danger.

One thing I never understood about KAt mains was why they always assume the worst...It#s lke " well in this scenario and this and this kata is soooo hard to play tehrefore balance, hurdurhur". Never have I heard anyone mention all the good matchups she can get where your enemy literallly can't do shit (there's more than enough junglers/midlaners who can't shut her down early as easily). Just having a few counters doesn't make a champion balanced.

And finally, on something i said previously....No, I did, in fact, not use the argumentum ad populum. When you look at a controversial champ that is adored by many and hated by most, I'M pretty sure the champ is not balanced. Why? because a majority of people feel that it's toxic. It doesn't even have to be the majority.

It's the same with Riven, Akali, Zed and many other snowballing champs. they simply are no fun to play against once they get teh slightest of leads, which, by definition, is bad design. If the only argument against is "well those who play and like her say she has weaknesses even thought these weaknesses aren't as easily exploited as they make them out to be" then I don't know why you keep claiming that your views are based on facts and mine aren't.

In fact, all your arguments are as good as mine because they are entirely subjective or without necessary context, yet you still insist on being right. It almost seems lke your entire base of reasoning is "I already know I'm right, so my arguments are by default more logical"