Talk:Rumble/@comment-71.142.78.182-20120731074114/@comment-67.171.60.104-20120801094644

1) I don't think you know what "nerfed to the ground" means. 2) W is untouched, and the damage loss to E is negligible. 3) "Kiting" Rumble lategame? Really? Between R, Rylai's, and any accuracy on E, you won't get kited unless you're overheating at the wrong times, and even then it's pretty idiot-proof. 4) He's actually a pretty decent bully early game. His mid game is dependent on R use (which means it's great if you're good), and his late game took a pretty decent hit, however, considering Flamespitter is still one of the most damaging abilities across all AP carries, he's still in a good place.

But by all means, keep using sensationalism and scare tactic power-phrases like "nerfed to the ground", "Irelia", and "absolutely no presence" to make people believe you, rather than noting that his win ratio is incredibly high lately and he's overperforming. When things are at the top, they can take quite a beating before hitting useless status. Saying he's unplayable, or nerfed to the ground might seem like a great idea to try and bully the population into believing your cause, but really, you're overreacting.

Also, your "462 vs 468" argument assumes 0 AP. Please keep pretending he can't buy items. He still has (up to) between a 1.35 and 1.68 AP Ratio on his Q, and it's AoE.

Rumble is a manaless bully who can press an advantage into a near-guaranteed victory. Go ahead and stop playing him if you think he's useless now, it'll be one less instalocking top who doesn't understand game balance fundamentals.