Talk:Kalista/@comment-24496127-20170220153649/@comment-8506165-20170223083628

Naz, what's the point in even having a discussion with you? If someone cites their personal opinion, you put on your "I'M A GAME DESIGNER" hat and say that they have design "ass-backwards" because clearly they don't know anything about it. If they cite Riot, who have a bunch of designers on their staff, you accuse them of being "parrots" and announce there's no point discussing anything with them. Because apparently being a game designer counts when it's you, but not when it's Riot expressing the crowdsourced opinions of their entire design and balance team.

I'm genuinely curious. Is there a way to engage you in any kind of fruitful discussion if I disagree with you? Because it seems like I'm wasting time even trying. I'm fine with spirited debate, but you seem to dismiss the other person out of hand a lot of the time. Not just me - I've observed a few of your other Wikia debates where someone will present a long argument and your response is a one-liner. I'm sure I could have a fine discussion with you if we broadly agreed but were discussing specifics, but if I disagree with you I'd honestly rather not even bother at this point. Feels like a tremendous waste of effort.