Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1876049-20150731182500/@comment-5266525-20150801040311

I am of mixed (mostly negative) opinion regarding the additions.

I agree with Feirund's point about (possibly) the tedium of having to constantly revise the descriptions as time goes on and more importantly I am concerned about its subjectivity and what happens when an editor will inevitably come in and have strong disagreements about the content of the paragraph. Runeglaive is released and Ezreal suddenly becomes perfectly usable from a kitey AD marksman to an uncatchable AP sniper - suddenly we have two equally valid descriptions, so which is used and why?

I would not say the comparisons being made to the DotA wiki are quite applicable in this case as while they have flavour texts, there also exist usage tips that explain how the kit functions on the same page. A short paragraph may work as a snapshot, but ultimately without any more detailed supplements a reader still isn't really going to be any the wiser on how the kit itself fulfils the stated playstyle.

I still have a mixed opinion despite these concerns because I feel that while this sort of flavour text would be better suited for something like the Strategy pages, said pages themselves have fallen into heavy disrepair, and I myself am not sure what to think about attempting to take disjointed steps to alleviate it.

Such a project, in my opinion, would be best suited when accompanied an overhaul of the page layout similar to what was demoed by Emptylord a while back with Azir and Fiddlesticks', but that doesn't seem likely to happen any time soon.