Talk:Tryndamere/@comment-4636093-20180423110823/@comment-33848765-20180423144920

I disagree with that statement. I hate that that people want to change something just because its old. That's what happened to my beloved Urgot, rito couldn't stand that there is such champ as ranged tank, so they changed him tto be completely team reliant.

Tryndamere's kit is fine, i don't see anything outdated (clarify what is so "old" about him), he has healing, he has dash, he has debuff, and ultimate that defines Tryndamere.

He is indeed a split-pusher, heck, he is actually tye best of split-pushers, but its easy to lose if u dont know how or when to split-push. And if your team can't teamfight at all, then every champion fits into your reasoning.

And id like to say it once again, i dont understand why ppl want to changed something just because it was there for some time. Is something being here for a bit longer is so bad? I personally dont find any other champion as fun to play as Tryndamere, and i dont want want him to be changed just because someone think he is old, some people are fine with the way it is.

Also, it's not like that im afraid of the changes... not entirely at least. It's just that i dont think riot riot does their reworks right, especially with simple champions. Nowadays, if u want to learn new champions, understanding their abilities only will take you nonsensical amount of time. With every new champ and rework, lol is more and more going further away from their "easy to learn, hard to master" rule.

And as my end card, I am saying that to all of the people that think every champ needs a rework, i know that most of you want "satisfaction" from your game, but think about all this people that like to play easier champs, even if their difficulty is at the braindead level. Not every champ has go be ryze/zed/orianna or or other faker's pawn. Not every champ needs flashy new mechanics, or hard to do combos to outplay others. There are enough champs like that. And besides, we have 140 champs in the game, wouldnt it be nice if some of them stay the way they are? If someone has decent winrate or or playrate, then i dont see reason for changes. If that doesnt convince you, then just let some of them stay old and simple, for the sake of us, this a little more casual group of players, whether we play only normals (like me) or are playing rarely, we still are playing the same game, and we have the right to enjoy it.