Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-3308937-20140828121932/@comment-6016076-20140831203146

Feirund wrote: I disagree. I would trust a wiki strategy page to be less subjective than "Sm3xyB0y'SX33 ROFLSTOMP jungleGG guide LOL". Of course, but you're not a robot who can't make logical inferences. The advantage of "Sm3xyB0y'SX33 ROFLSTOMP jungleGG guide LOL" is that you get to read the title and skip it. Removing the strategy page doesn't force you to read that guide, so I don't understand the analogy. Why not instead try out the guide that has 20k upvotes and 4.8 / 5 stars?

The problem with the strategy page on the Wiki is that the writer of "Sm3xyB0y'SX33 ROFLSTOMP jungleGG guide LOL" can edit in advice from his guide, and the reader of the Wiki doesn't know it's from a questionable source. Perhaps limited advice that is obviously good or bad can be managed by an admin here, but there's a grey area that will be difficult to discriminate between when there are 120 different champions to be knowledgeable of. And it will be a lot of work to monitor changes to these pages.