Thread:Double Slap/@comment-3017217-20150501142244/@comment-3017217-20150515082511

Double Slap wrote: Oh, bleh, didn't really clearly explain. Excuse me, who did't explain?

My focus as "a budding economist"(please don't laugh) is the exponent. Deterring players' effort to try and do everything instead focusing on their role. Less Jacks of all trades masters of none.

Last but not least, that is what most people I have physically met(face to face) expect when someone talks relatively to a measure(x); [the multiplication of the measure(x) with the (ratio+1)] elevated to (the time passed divided by the frequency of the compounding)

if and only if the exponent is 1[the time passed equals the frequency of the compounding( divisor should be different from 0 to divide )]

This equals to x(R+1) = Rx + x if we apply the distributive property.

The same with Bank deposits.

Even people who have no experience with exponents (like my 9-year-old sister who is just getting used to percentages asked me for the extra 10 cents

I wanted to borrow 10 euros to buy writing material and she asked for interest and so I told her I would owe her one tenth more each day passed

2 days passed and when I asked to "pay my dues" the answer was 12 euros and 10 cents) show their expectations with them.