Thread:NeonSpotlight/@comment-658634-20140528070852/@comment-1330314-20140528151656

I agree with BlackSmith, the previous format was better. People replying to each other quoted their posts, which made it easier to see how the conversation was flowing. This new thread was apparently made to quell uncivil discussion and personal attacks, but that went south the moment the "Willbach Issue" section got added.

That said, I think the discussion has stabilized, now that more people have started discussing things there. I think we may actually be close to forming a consensus: the collapsible template proposition has been very popular so far (the disclaimer not as much), and a lot of people also want to rename gold value/efficiency to the less misleading "statistical value/efficiency". The discussion is moving forward and is receiving far more positive contributions than any of the previous threads. Deleting the page would simply bring us back to square one, and people like ClariS and Deshiba would just take advantage of that to trot out arguments that were addressed in previous discussions and bog down the new discussion.