Talk:Armor/@comment-27371060-20151209110346/@comment-5723439-20160125230500


 * I* perfectly understand the mathematics and the conversation.

The person who is most likely to be reading this article for information is someone who is easily confused by the jargon.

It is perfectly mathematically accurate to say that buying AP is useless because the marginal gain of EHP withh respect to AP is 0 (except on Vlad). But we don't put that because it's unneeded and just creates more confusion to potential readers. For a similar reason, I am arguing that the proposed wording to explain the marginal gain relationship of EHP between armor and hp is faulty because it pulls in unnecessary, albeit true, mathematics.

Two simple sentences that convey the following in plain English should suffice:

"EHP(hp,armor)=hp*(100+armor)/100=hp+hp*armor/100

Partial(EHP, hp)=1+armor/100

Partial(EHP, armor)=hp/100"