Thread:NeonSpotlight/@comment-4698489-20150813050322/@comment-4698489-20150813063733

What gives you alone the right to decide and enforce these standards? I'm all for standardization and consistency, but big changes like the one involving adding FlipText everywhere should not have happened to begin with without discussion. I don't understand how you can accuse me of ignoring discussion when I've both made a forum thread and directly messaged relevant editors to gather opinions and create discussion. You, on the other hand, made all those changes by yourself and continue to defend them by yourself. Furthermore, rather than acknowledge the points I've made, you continue to make all kinds of accusations against my character.

Even now you claim that I don't have a standard for fixing the FlipText issue when I've already explained it in length. Keeping it simple here, my standard is that FlipText should not hide any information that cannot be calculated from the information shown by default. This type of information can be more succintly called essential or non-derivative information.

That is the only additional standard that I think is needed. All essential information should always be shown on the page so it can be seen without clicking and so they can be compared side-by-side. Non-essential information will use or not use FlipText depending on the other (current) standards. My proposal being so simple is why I went ahead and started making edits considering that there was only one editor opposing it. I didn't see any point in dragging out the process just for the sake of one dissenting editor.