Thread:ClariS/@comment-3017217-20141026134417/@comment-3017217-20141029123116

Ntoulinho wrote: Nonetheless an inverse function IS still a function. That still does not authorize you to apply flawed logic to this: linearity of a function's curve only indicates linearity of a function if it is a linear function in the first place. Inverse curves of functions with no diminishing returns will be concave, a fact you are unwilling to accept.

Ntoulinho wrote: I consider that which multiplies the Effective Health the output and not the BONUS Effective Health. "That which multiplies the effective health" presumably being damage reduction. The issue here is that to calculate how much damage you can take the formula only makes sense if you apply it to a specific amount of health (100 armor at 1000 health and 100 armor at 2000 health won't let you take the same amount of damage), which just means that you're forced to calculate effective health anyway.

Ntoulinho wrote: Damage Reduction =100 / (100 + Armour) is that which Riot gives us it HAS diminishing returns and that which I requested to change It does not give diminishing returns, as proven above. Not only are your arguments erroneous and devoid of mathematics, but they completely refuse to address the above mathematical proofs that resistances do not give diminishing returns. The existence of just one sound proof of a fact is enough to fully justify it, until it is disproven. This is not a debate, where you present arguments and counter-arguments to a third party. This is mathematics: your answer is either true or false, and so irrespective of your point of view. Unless you can refute the above proof that armor/MR provides constant returns, you and your opinion are wrong, plain and simple. A Line IS Straight Ευθεία and Reta in Greek and Portuguese respectively  and its definition is the shortest lenght between 2 points

A Curve is an object with infinite lenght void of thickness in which the are not 2 Points that make a straight segment.

There cannot be a linear curve this is an Oxymoron

Effective Health multiplier is the multiplicative inverse of Damage Reduction

Effective Health Multiplier x Damage Reduction = 1

This is done so the values>1

100/101 -> 101/100.

Now as for the "proof"

Let us do it step by step I will ask and you will answer.

Over this week I think I will give you the algebraic demonstration you seek. I will be setting variables on the course of the demonstration

D1 = Damage Taken

D2 = Damage Dealt by the Enemy before reductions

D3=Damage Multiplier

a=armour

H1=Health

m=Effective health multiplier

H2=Effective Health (damage needed to die)

Willbachbakal

D1 = D2 x D3

D3 (for values>0) = 100 / (100 + a)

H2 = D2 & D1 = H1

D2 x D3 =  H1

D2 = H1 / D3 because D3=/=0

D2 = H1 x (100 + a) / 100

H2 = H1 x (100 + a) / 100?

Yes, No, because............., I do not know! This is a direct question and the possible answers are those 3 please do not say ANYTHING other than one of those 3!

Guess this 11 Months between finishing school and now that I will start the College took their toll on me!!!!!!

The first part of the demostration took me more than an hour....................... and you might not agree but I think unless I mixed the variables in any point that THIS is correct!