Thread:Tesla Effect/@comment-25432338-20150629132834/@comment-25432338-20150703162918

The problem is the way faction pages are made; the page is about Bilgewater holistically, but the body of the text is copy-pasting chunks of bios or JoJ articles; all those things have their own pages that can be linked to. How is the entire Bilgewater Days article or Grog-article important enought to merit one-third of the entire page? As of yet Nautilus is no more important to Bilgewater than Graves; why does he have his own sub-title? The new section was an attempt to give that material a more appropriate place on the page, which should be about Bilgewater, not a collection of full-text essays on trivia vaguely related to Bilgewater. The new section is aboslutely how that particular material should be treated on the page; collected, summarized and linked to. Anyone that wants to keep reading the full old-canon articles can follow the links.

The JoJ is confirmed NOT canon and shouldn't be considered a canon source, so having that in particular make up the body of the page is even worse. Adding this section is absolutely the best way to treat the JoJ on the faction pages. Non-canon source-material should just be linked to, not make up the entire page. The wiki is horribly sourced as is, but at the very least out-of-canon material should be treated that way''. ''Proper canon and non-canon shouldn't be mixed together horribly without even source-linking it. Non-canon should be kept separate from the page's main body.

I spent a lot of time making sure the Shurima and Freljord pages became what they are, so I don't see what you base that certianity of my lazyness on. I'll get through all the factions in time, starting ''as soon as I can be sure the section won't be removed for no reason off the Bilgewater page. ''Can I return the section without you reverting it again?