Board Thread:Administrator's noticeboard/@comment-1445357-20130110104757/@comment-6001388-20130116170326

LionsLight wrote: And out of the 22 votes, 20 of them were one liners of no content backing up their position. I would take that as very poor support, Mineko. That being said, all of Thresh's pages have been protected for now.

BorosPaladin wrote:

Ozuar wrote: There needs to be proper channels for us to follow, however, to allow for new champions to have their data edited in ways that actually reflect changes made to them or new ideas that have been discovered. Who's working on this? How about instead of just a straight lockout a system wherein every edit must be pre-approved by a moderator until something along the lines of a week after the champion's release date? That goes against the spirit of wiki which promotes editing by the public. I am quite unhappy at how many moderators are already using the rollback tool for non-vandalism edits and would rather not support them actively using it for screening edits on new pages. I really hope this suggestion gets approved. I just made my account but use this wiki a lot. Sometimes I just think "What is this doing here?" (I'm refering to information that's not suppose to be there). The moderators will get a lot more work, but the wiki will get so much better. Maybe, it would be helpfull if you could promote some lonng time and good wiki-users as moderator.