Thread:NeonSpotlight/@comment-3017217-20150307200227/@comment-4091261-20150313224123

Clarity is not an obstacle. It is a requirement for discussion. A discussion cannot be made without clarity, which is why I'm suggesting you address it by making your thesis statement clear.

For example, your lack of clarity in the original post is due to your lack of transitions, ex. first, then, as a result, furthermore, that is. The Transitive Property of Euclid's Axioms, i.e. silly syllogisms, is a very good representation of why you think Krufix is incorrect. The problem is that without transitions, the train of thought cut off when you made a simple line-break. The physical connection between the details and the points were not there. The process didn't flow properly and lacked clarity as a result.

Now while practicing clarity techniques may help you in general with discussions, your problem here is that you cannot accept their silence. These people are so lodged into your mind that you haven't responded to Akumaryukendan, who directly assaulted the credibility of your entire build choice. If you wanted to carry on this discussion, you shouldn't keep focusing on their past statements. If your point is strong, then their silence means that your point is the last thing any bystander sees.

Although, your point isn't the last thing people see. The last thing people see is Akumaryukendan bashing your build. So if you want to restore your credibility, address this comment instead, and not on his wall, but on the comment itself, where everyone can see. Remember this is a conversation over a cup of coffee, not a debate room. There does not need to be a concluding statement from each side as conversations come and go as easily as leaves blow in the wind.