Thread:Denvir/@comment-3974211-20181214025609/@comment-37207660-20181215001102

(inb4 shadow-banned again as soon as Big Brother detects my presence and the NKVD detachment is dispatch and/or for having the balls to call out hypocrisy; what can I say other than I have principles and convictions to uphold, eh?)

Autoblock just expired (speaking of pettiness: what do you call having your edits reverted just because your name's on 'em? Heh). I'll take it and you have my deepest gratitude. I must say, though: the reason is not besides the point, especially when it's clear as day it was a set-up (and here I thought the internet was a tad more... libertarian... meritocratic, even... than the physical world; guess I was wrong on that count).

Hoping you don't misunderstand and that you understand I'm not demanding anything as well as that I am sincerely happy to be able to resume an enjoyable, psychically-fulfilling activity, I simply must ask a few questions:


 * 1) What about people being pissed off at your very existence? That's 200% on them, not me: I have a rule of never casting the first stone (not my fault I constantly evolve my editing while they mindlessly, repetitively copypaste - standards I myself created in the first place, at that... the iron-E, eh?) but that doesn't mean return fire isn't earned.
 * 2) Pretty sure the motivations aren't clear for the conspired (if they don't see it coming, that is) but are for the conspirators? That's kinda the whole point of a conspiracy.
 * 3) Could you define 'problematic'? Because I'm not dumbing down my editing just because the usual suspects can't stand being exposed for endorsing quantity over quality. Same goes for expecting complete submission and unquestioning obedience like a useful idiot (say, please don't take offense at the observation but 'join the community' is one step too close to sounding... hivemind-ish)
 * 4) Who are these 'annoyed'?
 * Is it this guy? Dude's in no position to do anything other than explaining himself (I saw the Discord chat: 'Our' icons? 'Should' be? Danny-boy, your authoritarian-collectivist colors are showing). As if that wasn't enough, look at his arrogance (see summary). Easy to belittle others when you cried to have your competitors sent to the gulag, am I right? (''example: I can't compete with you but I sure as hell won't frame you to have you thrown under the bus because A) I respect you, B) I am hoping to learn from you, and C) I'm not contemptible scum) It would seem calling the NKVD requires waaaaay less effort than clicking 'Message Wall' and asking directly.
 * Is it you-know-who? (tip: the following is not lies because, while I can be called many things, 'liar' is not one of those) The one who defamed-insulted-belittled both me and my work, deems me a third-class citizen, and downright plays victim while displaying otherworldly levels of lack of self-awareness? The one who simply couldn't resist jumping at the chance to get rid of me while disrespecting me some more? BOI, there's the 'TRIGGERED' meme and then there's this gold-medal levels of pettiness.
 * Because I've seen the same pattern unfold a million times over my little-over-a-quarter-of-a-century existence, what do you wanna bet they won't show up to disprove anything of the above and, if they do show up, it'll be to deflect like there's no tomorrow? I said many things back in the day (do you remember the rigged admin election where neutral votes didn't count except they did? The day I left?) but one still stands: easier to get offended than to own up.

Just saying, man, because I appreciate you: if you're looking for lack of self-moderation, you're barking up the wrong tree (I don't mind you visiting me, though <3 ). ''If a Commissar doesn't shoot me before you read this: could you please tell me about that super template you mentioned? I am real curious: is it Template:Sti?''