Thread:Demise101/@comment-1990160-20140323005411/@comment-3459498-20140323020013

And there were no warnings?

I would also appreciate it if you didn't reblock him once I brought up the issue. Your decision does not trivialise mine. Just because you've made a point (which I was not even given the chance to answer), it does not allow you to bypass discussion and go ahead with your decision.

I think your impartiality has been breached in this case, specifically because it has involved you. Say what you will, but the block is too harsh and too soon. I believe in this case, you should at least allow another administrator to take control of the situation, as you are involved directly in it; in honesty, I think we both know (given previous trends) that you would never have intervened with the discussion if the target had not been you. Failing previous methods, I would like for you to at least discuss it with the user involved and resolve the issue correctly. Without playing the abuse card, I think the discussion was an open one, and should have been resolved on a user level.

Also, I think it would have been more appropriate to strike through duplicate lines rather than omitting them entirely (so that your edits are more transparent and hence not subject to questioning). The lack of edit summaries is particularly disturbing, as at first I was under the impression that you were simply removing sections of text (until I checked changelogs and noticed that there were duplicates, which took some time).