Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-3308937-20140828121932/@comment-1990160-20140905121231


 * Writing off somebody's extensively written feedback for the singular reason of "screenshot not provided". Noted. http://i.imgur.com/8Lhlcji.jpg
 * Also of note is that every time people offer feedback on your proposed page redesigns, your response falls on the lines of "your issues are just with the formatting" - unwilling to change on the basic premise that the pages should be changed (which was never clearly established), and that by just shifting some things around everyone will be happy. My opinion is more than just criticisms of formatting, but that the entire endeavor is unnecessary and sloppily done - "move this here... shift that to there... extend the page here..." with the end-result of two relatively coordinated (although I really don't think that giving that much text-space to pets/recommended items/skins on the mainpage is necessary) pages with one "catch-all" page AKA cluster____. Our traditional separations of content were well-established, whereas this page redesign current offers second building to anything that isn't champion/ability info or background information.
 * Extending on that last sentence, I think it is relevant here to mention the relationship of individual contribution and overall wiki project-ness. Individuals edit and work on the wiki because they want to make positive changes, to create a better wiki, and they often take pride in their work. However, when one individual redesigns several majorly used templates, and proposes a page redesigns that feature those templates as "headliner" / top-of-the-page main features, this begins to cross into vanity. I am not saying this out of malice, but to point out to people that these proposed and previous changes (& their respective discussions) have been centered around one individual user and his/her ideas. (I mentioned this previously in Thread:1147849)
 * /Strategy page reference: this is another thing entirely. Similar to what I described about creating a new discussion about content-shifting of old /Background, there are too many major changes that you're trying to make happen all at once. My post was an effort to evaluate the pages *as they existed*, providing my feedback through approaching as an imagined end-user
 * "we only chose Azir" - "we" being two individual users, let that be clear

I am not making any hard/decisive judgments here (to the disappointment of some), but offer my words as an "expert" opinion that others will read and utilize in the formation of their own judgments.