Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-3308937-20150810111756/@comment-658634-20150814222127

Again about the subject 'repeating what official site said' that's seems to come up time after time with hobby wikis. Do you want to be a parrot or do you want to be source of information? If the later, use references. If the former, copy & paste whole official site and be proud of what you have done and be the sole user of the site. Information is data that is collected, processed, evaluated and represented in a way that gives knowledge to the reader from that data without the need for the reader to got rough the actual data (except if he is skeptical about the process thus going after the reference). The argument about being objective and subjective is pointless as the intro would point to the facts why the champion is this and that. Lee Sin is mobile champion that has excellent gap closing (#hyperlink to his Sonic Wave) and disengage (#hyperlink to his Safeguard) abilities. And so on.

As the intro is about the champion, not about items, it should not have a problem about different builds as they should be cowered by it. There is and should be its own section about item synergy.

Secondly burying the intro to some sub page is dead idiotic idea. It works just as well as asking the girls name in the next morning, after you slept with her. Feel free to disagree with me but from my experience all the wiki readers are looking for clear information about what the champion can do, what items work well with him/her/it and what are his cons and pros. Intro cowers both ends leaving item synergy for its own section. The huge block with numbers and bars looks nicely artistic but it does not really offer any information to the reader. Its data, pure numbers, that you can't even compare with others (and doing so in the first section would be too much). A intro with less numbers would offer something worth while to read. If you doubt the math (Is Vayne really games fastest attacker?), you send them after the references like champion Attacks Speed comparing List Page Article (or I would send them to 'attack speed' where the comparing would be done and everything else attack speed related but thats not the way people like to do things in here).

For letting only one person do things also leads to a point where the intro is that persons opinion thus subjective. Plus it downright pisses all over the 'every one can edit' principle. IF You want objective, keep it editable by all but keep tight rein on references/grounding.

For a technical side, if the intro is editable by everyone that can use reference, please don't include it into some champion Data Article that is behind three other templates. There is no need for it and it just pushes editing even future away from normal mortals.