Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-3308937-20140828121932/@comment-658634-20140902213958

Problem with these guides and overall everything that is written by first person is that they are not objective and like Dirty Harry tells us opinions are like assholes; everybody has one. There are millions that think Robin is a great artist but it is a fact that there is a greater number of people that don't think so or just don't care. That '20k upvotes and 4.8 / 5 star' guide is just the same. Some think its great because the way it is written, the colors or are just fans of the editor. For better build information a most winning build would be more accurate. Then again anyone that is familiar with the game concept knows that builds are always situation depend so providing the readers with most winning build might be harmful as not everyone understands the reasons why it is a winning build. I always build lich bane for veigar. Now this is a opinion and has little weight except to my fans. When I say that lich bane synergies with veigar's Baleful Strike as it has as low as 2.4 sec cooldown and it shares the same range as his basic attacks and combined with Baleful Strikes passive it enables him to deliver another half his ability power as damage. Now this is something everyone can relate to.

That said, as strategy is planing your actions on highest level, I suggest renaming the section to tactics. Although even that is quite misleading as to my understanding people don't want to read stuff like 'When malphite is behind this wall, Yasu go here and then malphite uses ulti and yasu ulties'. Because that is tactics. I suggest rename the section to synergy as that is what people are looking for. Information what works well with what and why, hence synergy would fit as a paragraph headline.