Talk:Twitch/@comment-27355169-20160113090947

After talking about the argument down below i came to a interesting thought about the differences of Sivir and twitch. After coming to this thought i support Force of Reckons idea more then ever. Here is the thought: So Twitch has all these moves that help out his expunge. He has attack speed from Q, he has Venom cask to slow enemy and add +2 venom to expunge and then he has his ult longer range and more ad to pierce and and hit as many targets as possible. Sivir also only has one ability that deals damage just like twitch. However her ability deals the full damage 200% with the only drawback being you don't hit minions while doing it. The counter argument here is that Twitch doesn't have to aim his 150% ratio with a true damage dot and can nuke entire teams his ult deals less damage the more enemies it hits just saying. And sivir has to aim her 200% ad ratio. Sivir can actually activate ricochet to hit whole teams too. It's only 80% ad ratio so it's minus 20% per each auto. But during ult she gets a attack speed steroid as well. These champs actually have some interesting similarities. The startling thing to note here is that one champ was made to be a Adc/Assassin and deal high damage and the other champ was made to be quote on quote "The Safest adc in the game" so it's remarkable that Sivir can come close to Twitch damage to begin with. I think that alone stands to show that our Rat needs a slight nerf to come to terms with what his job is meant to do. Comparitively speaking One miss fortune ult beats out both of their damage xD That's one more reason.