Board Thread:Wiki discussion/@comment-4881935-20130319052917/@comment-3308937-20130320235033

Nystus wrote: the biggest feedback i've seen was "i like X better"

I'm too lazy for this... I vote original unless there's a major revamp of option 1.

Option 1 changes the page entirely to something more akin to a champion page without having, imo, the appropriate amount of content (i.e. abilities) to warrant that change. The thing it has going for it is the fact that it does change the layout of the page and could possibly be warped into something more usable and compact for the reader (compact the majority of the page into the infobox and make it like the infobox I made for the CLG and TSM pages).

Option 2: I see it as a way of trying to sync the champion pages and the item pages, nothing else. The issue with this though is that abilities and items have different info and need different sizes and page styles to look appealing. I don't see this layout as visually appealing, it looks out of place on the page being that it's the only thing on the page with that kind of style and, compared to the original, it looks cramped and squashed for no other reason than compacting the info. I don't think this layout would be bad if we were using a mass of them on one page, sort of like Riot's champion cards, but as the main object on an article page it just isn't substantial looking enough to constitute its own existence.

The original is the original, there's a reason why we've been using it for so long. It's simple, clean and gets the job done effectively. One may argue there's no reason to change it just for the sake of change and I agree. Unless the other options are brought up to a higher level of quality or further distinguished (option 1) in the way they're used to become more than just a replacement for this layout then I don't see a reason for us to change.