Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1990160-20140521040036/@comment-1330314-20140522225921

If you want to do this by vote, the current tally is:


 * For removal: TehAnonymous, Feirund, Deshiba, Dooomninja, Neverff, ZFlash, ClariS, Andre5913, NeonSpotlight, Typhron.
 * Total: 10
 * Neutral: Lykrast, NTR Captain.
 * Total: 2
 * Against removal: Willbachbakal, Packdemon, Penuile, NoobOfLore, Contractas1, Emptylord, Supp0rt4n00bz, Alartan, DingyuChowMein, Yatsura, Double Slap, Beeboopson, SirAston.
 * Total: 13

So "against removal" clearly wins here, even if you were to lump the neutral users with the "for removal" side. I personally don't think decisions that hinge on an intellectual, and therefore logically resolvable, conflict should be decided on a popular vote, but if it is your wish and the wish of others I gladly defer to you. :P

ClariS wrote: If you believe I have that type of habit, that is your choice, but none of my removal is not without reasons or purpose for this wiki. But if you wish to desire to know why I didn't bother to inform everyone about the removal is because you are a thick-headed person who never listens and will argue forever on a recorded tape. I have no desire to spend another three months arguing with a endless loop such as yourself.

Check yourself before you wreck yourself, ClariS. This is getting into serious personal attack territory here. It also pretty much confirms what I'm saying: you care little for others and so would rather go do things your own way and create a whole slew of problems than listen to their input. This goes completely against the user guidelines of a wiki.