Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-3308937-20140828121932/@comment-3974211-20140906110636

Missing the 1st and 18th level stats. — No-one cares about their base stats at level 18, because no-one sees their base stats at level 18 (owing to buying items). The only times people might care about their base stats is levels 1-their first shop. There is currently no feasible solution to the problem due to the restrictions in place in the wikia system. You could pester an admin into creating a javascript, or you could make one yourself, but please stop being profane for no reason (especially when it's irrelevant to the topic at hand).

There should not be any notes. — Lots of champions will not have notes. However, many champions already do - and Azir will be one of them. Telling players that Azir's must rank Arise! first is not Arise-specific details (since it's also "You cannot rank Shifting at level 1." and "You cannot rank Conquering at level 1.").

Pets are placed after abilities — Most abilities that summon pets do something as well. Some exceptions, such as Jack in the Box, could be removed as the ability is exclusively about the pet - but things like Summoning Tibbers is an ability in its own right. If the most common user-resolution was larger, I would consider putting pets next to the ability (and share the page width) - but, alas, the most common resolution only appoints me ~670px of page width. Listing pets separately is also standard across all moba wikias I've seen (e.g. Dota). We used to have separate articles (I think Tibbers still does) - but merging them with the champion makes the most sense.

No ToC makes mobile reading hard and navigation hard. — I do not know how to create mobile-specific alterations to the layout. Perhaps it's just an iPhone feature, but there's a little ☰ button on the right side of on every page that brings up the contents (even on pages TOC is disabled). Perhaps you haven't noticed this or it is not available on your phone. Abilities should be their own articles that are pulled to the champions page. — I think you're confusing a database for an encyclopaedia. Admitedly I don't fully disagree with you, but it is not necessary to create a unique page for every piece of information (particularly if you don't need to categorize it).

Background includes only Lore thus Lore would be more fitting name. — The term "Background" comes from a Champion's Background, which is the passage of lore. It's a misnomer that people have related background to non-lore content. That said, it could be renamed to lore.

Trivia should not have its own section — I initially planned to do this (having Trivia at the bottom of each article sans gameplay). However, there is a "trivia community" and I veto'd splitting trivia simply "for the readers".

By having each skin at their own article you dodge lot of your problems you are trying to tackle now. — Not really. I would still need to find somewhere relevant to put the list the skin-links. Also, as above, I'm not interested in splitting trivia across a dozen pages (per champion).

@Vsagent
 * Agreed with comments on Strategy. I honestly thing that the page should be retired "At this time.", pending the time Riot doesn't have ~100 champions with poor/out-dated "official" strategy.
 * I'm actually very pro Patch Notes on the mainpage, since it was proposed. It makes sense, and it makes patch-day very convenient (because users, myself included, often forget to update the patch notes when they update the champion's page).