Talk:Ezreal/@comment-3238314-20110729142143/@comment-2124153-20110801152247

It's not my business what you care or don't care about; if it was, I'd say more about the hilarious waste of Seals and Glyphs on your runepage. I'm just commenting on the economics of the Rageblade compared to the Gunblade, specifically as it relates to damage on Trueshot Barrage (which is Ezreal's ultimate ability), since an ult steroid is partly what this thread was about in the first place. You want a cheaper Hextech for TB, I say learn how to use a Guinsoo's.

Now, it's true that the Gunblade has more benefits than the Rageblade overall, but this a pedestrian point to make, considering that the the GB is *quite literally* 62% more expensive than the RB. It's like comparing a B. F. Sword to a Ghostblade, for chrissakes. To put that into perspective for you, consider that the 1400g differential between RB/GB is almost enough (210g away) for a Wriggles. Note that not only does the lantern when added to RB completely evaporate the Gunblade's lead in AD and lifesteal, but it also has Armor, the minion proc, and the free ward. How's that for cost-effective?

Sorry to hear that you have trouble keeping stacks up. I find it easy, seeing as how just *hitting* something with a Mystic Shot already gives you two stacks by itself. Ezreal can easily get four stacks quickly in an emergency situation where he needs to fling an ult across the map, which is still 76% of the Gunblade's boost to the ult. You can also get stacks by attacking towers, which makes the added 32% AS really pretty powerful for when there aren't any easy ways to raise Rising Spell Force quickly (I mention this only because you completely ignored Hextech's lack of attack speed). I also find it handy that keeping RB stacked also contributes towards filling up my Manamune.

Spell Vamp more or less sucks for Ezreal, and we both know it, so don't embarrass yourself by defending it strongly.