Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-1876049-20150731182500/@comment-1920550-20150801132250

Shaw Fujikawa wrote: I do not feel that champions with particularly divergent build paths can always be sufficiently described in a single homogeneous paragraph. Tank Cho'Gath doesn't play anything like AP Cho'Gath; Ekko is in the same boat. There's Critplank, APlank and Tankplank. Lulu has her Machine Gun, AP and support playstyles to consider. Bruiser Nidalee focuses on close-range brawling over AP Nidalee's javelin poke. And these are just the off-the-wall examples as opposed to more unconventional off-builds like ADC Ahri. It seems idealistic to say you can accommodate any and all situations without being vague. These flavour texts are mostly focused on the general feel of a champion not so much the painful specifics. Even most champions with diverging buildpaths will mostly play the same. AP and AD Ezreal both focus on poke, kite and global snipes. AD and AP Kog'Maw is still long range artilery damage. Lulu support and AP is still focused on early game harass and then her utility. Even Cho as a tank and AP is all about knocking people up, eating then and the growing into a kaiju. Even ADC Ahri is still all about dashing around and charming foes.

Shaw Fujikawa wrote: You're welcome to prove me wrong, of course, and I'm not strictly giving this a thumbs down, but it just feels to me like a bandaid fix to the problem that's more caused by an outdated page layout. :V I actually completely agree with this. The page layouts have quite a few isssues, but that should be a point made (and very much made) in another forum page to try and get a new layout and update them.

But at the same time i feel that wouldn't interfere with the goal of this project, which is to provide a short, concise and yes somewhat flavourful description of a champion to be read alongside the raw details of their abilities and give users a more comprehensive understanding of what makes X champion tick.