Thread:U N Ovvrn/@comment-3308937-20141227054923/@comment-9705522-20141228020401

Psykolog wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules This is obviously about wikipedia and not wikia, but the reasoning is the same. Tl;Dr, using loopholes or interpreting the rules the way you want and then defending yourself by saying that you didn't infringe them can't be a valid argument if your behavior is consistently the same and provokes the same reaction from users and moderators. Of course this wouldn't be a problem if you could justify yourself, which you haven't just yet -- see neon's post for explanations.

Moreover, https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ this helpful thing helped me and can help you. Taking a look at it could help you avoid doing such things as your last post in this thread.

This isnt using a loophole or interpreting the rules the way I want. This is literally an unidentified moderator breaking those rules. They made a stealth block, without a name given, no reason stated, no notification, and against the rules on that site. Additionally, there is one problem. I already got a warning for the things Neon mentioned. You cannot ban someone for something you already gave him a warning for. Thats called double jeopardy, and is illegal pretty much everywhere.

Additionally, the "ignore all rules" part is the true loophole. It means that all the written down rules of the sytem dont matter if you think they are hindering you. Additionally, since its not part of this websites policy, that wouldnt even apply.

Also, im familiar with that site, i quote it quite often. However, im afraid i made no logical fallacy here. Especially because, when it comes to systems written down in hard rules, logical fallacies have no place to be, because there are no arguments. No logic, if you want so.