User blog comment:Lyndongwapo/Serafin, the Adventurer/@comment-7709681-20170719033556/@comment-3391671-20170727215532

While your intentions may not have been so, even if you labeled your zodiacs as incompleted, I believe the link to them has created a misleading notion that you wanted them to be reviewed too. The reason to this is because you place a strong tie-in between Serafin and the 12 Zodiacs, thus Serafin suffers as a concept without knowledge of who these zodiacs are. So, people are lead on to think "we should criticize the zodiacs too." However, having a character's bio being spread upon 13 concepts is another detriment, and something reoccuring in all your concepts. I recommend that you work on standalone concepts to brush up champions who do not need to rely on being part of a larger whole to be acknowledged into being.

As for the links of the zodiac being a "trailer," I have to disagree. They are surely not garniture to a dish. You hint at them for sure, but they are more baggage without any contents, because they are in need of rework. You only post a trailer once there is enough contents in the work (the Zodiacs), and garniture should only be added if there is depth to each topping. As mentioned above, you have figuratively chained down Serafin's theme as an Adventurer with these 12 Zodiacs, and because they are part of an overdone trope with admittedly need of refurbishing, her grand entrance as a custom champion is not well received.

If you have an inspiration, then finish it before posting the work, as posting them along the way leads to incompletion; if you expect people to be excited for potential, then you need to live up to that with plausible sequels, not overblown fantasies. Just because you use big title names such as elements (an example) or the zodiacs will people follow one's work. This applies for anyone and everyone, not just you.