User blog comment:Hamengeri/Challenge Accepted: Linda, Unifier of the Light/@comment-7709681-20140129173001/@comment-7709681-20140129190357

Romanticism in that case, renaissance would be a cultural era that would theoreticaclly apply once the unification is achieved and the people want to increase their boundaries by the lack of social or political limitants by the cultural exchange and free expresion of it people.

The problem with romanticism is that is delivered from a emotional or sentimental response rather than a political or logical response, even if it has an unified social or cultural reason for its creation that can eventually become a revolutionary or liberating movement, be this agressive or peaceful (with the second been your intentions I suppose), the further result after the emancipation of the classical, traditional or existing limitants that were the reason for the creation of the primordial movement converge into the realization of a disjoined or divergent form of reasoning inside the revolutionaries which can lead to either a rich increase in the liberties of its people or their struggle for a unified yet divergent form of multifacetic existence.

Can be said aswell that even if it has a leader or leaders in the front of the movement without a proper person to lead once the action was done or the formed consolidation creating an autocratic leadership then could end in the repetition of the original motion against the rising leadership, entering into a perpetual motion of revolution and dictatorship.

As you can say that there is differences and separations inside the human civilization can be said aswell that all sentient civilization does so aswell, even if the elves (or at least their leaders) have good intentions for a unification they can't go against human's motion as much as this can't go against elvish's motion, or at least don't have shown signs to do so.