Board Thread:Wiki discussions and announcements/@comment-3308937-20150122092301/@comment-3308937-20150125075110

Willbachbakal wrote: Wandering Stranger wrote: In my opinion, I kinda agree with what Delarthian has said...that Cost efficiency may be good as a tooltip or trivial fact or so, but it doesn't seem major enough for being high up on the page or anything....

This seems to be a common complaint among many members of the community, particularly those who aren't big fans of cost efficiency, and so I think an important part of the discussion should be finding a way to make the section even more discreet.

As someone who thinks that "cost efficiency" has been given a lot more importance/time than it actually deserves I still stick by what I said in the last discussion which was to get rid of the misleading "cost efficiency" and replace it with statistical/quantifiable values and to make that more of trivia info than an actual part of the article. With that in mind I think I like your #5 option the most if we do just use quantifiable stats (no things like Guardian Angel passive). Keeping along this train of thought I think that the ideal information we would give would just be things like "40 ability power = 870g" and not even touch on % statistically efficient since a lot of people get caught up on those % numbers.