Talk:Kalista/@comment-24496127-20170220153649/@comment-26203093-20170223085653

Well, an argument for one would work. Picking up on who I'm referring to when I say 'play parrot' is another.

You haven't even tried addressing how the landscape's changed around her, and I don't see the point in throwing riot in front fo you as a shield when as I think is obvious to both of us; they're not here in the discussion. If all you need is to waddle off proud that riot agrees with you, then please, waddle off.

If you have an actual reason why kalista shouldn't be changed, then please, voice one. See these other people? They have opinions. They also have points. So does riot. And I can see their worry given her past, but I don't see the point in leaving her in the dirt when a few tweaks will make her at least see play.

And riot aren't the ones who has development ass-backwards; YOU'RE the one who said number tweaking would be expensive; it objectively isn't. A rework involves changes that ends up involving multiple disciplines and several discussions. THAT objectively is.

RIOT knows the cost. They're just worried for reasons I don't agree with and would circumvent it by "doing it right" which implies leaving her not seeing any action. I also believe most of the comments they've made on her are also fairly old.

"Feels like a tremendous waste of effort."

Oh I wonder what that feels like. Now do you have a point or would you like to find new and exciting ways of telling me you don't like my attitude?