Talk:Xerath/@comment-25075290-20180525162456/@comment-28977071-20180625043801

is not cuz he can, , , , use items and basically do anything he wants while ..

is actually not as well. He's self-pacified which makes a significant difference:
 * The term is a synonym for, having originated from - it's only current example in the game. The effect slows and disables use of ,  and items. As such, there should be no champs in existence self-applying this effect to themselves.
 * On the other hand, I couldn't find a self-pacified champ that wasn't able to or ward while channelling. However, a self-pacification slows as well.

Nevertheless, your question is interesting. I believe that the term "" is a bit overused in ability descriptions as an expression for practically any channel allowing movement. Plus lists of "self-pacified" champs seem to be outdated. Not being able to is imo the feature unique to each castable ability (ergo not having anything to do with self-pacify), not being able to  seems to be expectable for any channel that does not incorporate it naturally by itself. As such, I see only one difference with "mobile channels":

, and  are (unlike other "mobile channelers") unable to use item actives, except trinkets.

..hence you seem to be partially right, either both guys should be self-pacified or not.